2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2017.03.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A practical framework for regulating for-profit recreational marijuana in US States: Lessons from Colorado and Washington

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
60
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
60
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Speculation about RML effects largely assume that substituting cannabis for alcohol will be better for public health ( Anderson and Rees, 2014 ; Carnevale et al , 2017 ). Some experts have assumed that RMLs will lead to substitution of cannabis for alcohol ( Anderson and Rees, 2014 ; Kilmer, 2017 ), whereas others have been less sure ( Edwards, 1974 ; Hall and Lynskey, 2016 ; Hawken et al , 2013 ; Pacula and Sevigny, 2014 ).…”
Section: Epidemiologic Evidence On MML S and Cannamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Speculation about RML effects largely assume that substituting cannabis for alcohol will be better for public health ( Anderson and Rees, 2014 ; Carnevale et al , 2017 ). Some experts have assumed that RMLs will lead to substitution of cannabis for alcohol ( Anderson and Rees, 2014 ; Kilmer, 2017 ), whereas others have been less sure ( Edwards, 1974 ; Hall and Lynskey, 2016 ; Hawken et al , 2013 ; Pacula and Sevigny, 2014 ).…”
Section: Epidemiologic Evidence On MML S and Cannamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the year or so after legalization, Colorado saw a 63% increase in cannabis-related poison center calls for children, which was largely due to accidental cannabis edible ingestion ( 59 ). Colorado also saw four high-profile deaths related to consumption of edibles that occurred shortly after the legal retail market opened ( 60 ), and accumulating evidence suggested that edibles contributed to increased rates of cannabis-related ED visits ( 59 , 60 , 74 ). As a result of these harms, Colorado created a task force to address safety issues related to use of cannabis edibles, which resulted in tighter regulations and stricter packaging requirements ( 74 ).…”
Section: Approaches To Minimizing Acute Harms: Recommendations For Pumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These data strongly argue in favor of restriction of sales of edible products. However, complete prohibition of edible cannabis would undermine the success of legalization, as edibles are popular products that are prevalent even in jurisdictions without legal cannabis laws ( 74 ). As a result, the data from both Colorado and Washington state favor early restriction of edibles and high-potency cannabis products; this gives time for the retail market to stabilize and for data collection systems to be implemented, allowing for increased safety when newer cannabis products are eventually legalized ( 74 ).…”
Section: Approaches To Minimizing Acute Harms: Recommendations For Pumentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Consequently, METRC was initially ill-prepared to fulfill the market's demands. There was an avalanche of problems [108]: the MED regulatory agency mismanaged the roll-out of a predecessor system for medical cannabis [47], there were bottlenecks in manufacturing and distributing enough RFID tags for growers and producers [61], the central database had poor usability and uptime, preventing users from uploading their inventories as required by law [48], and innovative new products and business models could not be made to fit into METRC's models for logging transactions or ontologies for classifying products [17,121]. As METRC was introduced to regulate a legally precarious marketplace, its fumbled launch jeopardized the larger institutional experiment of legalizing recreational cannabis in Colorado.…”
Section: Case Study 2: Cannabis Informaticsmentioning
confidence: 99%