2020
DOI: 10.1038/s43018-020-0027-5
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A practical framework and online tool for mutational signature analyses show intertissue variation and driver dependencies

Abstract: Mutational signatures are patterns of mutations that arise during tumorigenesis. We present an enhanced, practical framework for mutational signature analyses. Applying these methods on 3,107 whole genome sequenced (WGS) primary cancers of 21 organs reveals known signatures and nine previously undescribed rearrangement signatures. We highlight inter-organ variability of

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

8
216
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 181 publications
(224 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
8
216
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We note that CHORD performs similarly to HRDetect based on predictions on the BRCA-EU dataset (AUROC = 0.98 for both models) 9 . In addition, the predictions of CHORD and HRDetect on the PCAWG dataset 10 were concordant for the vast majority of samples (1506/1526; 99%) (Supplementary Fig. 10 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We note that CHORD performs similarly to HRDetect based on predictions on the BRCA-EU dataset (AUROC = 0.98 for both models) 9 . In addition, the predictions of CHORD and HRDetect on the PCAWG dataset 10 were concordant for the vast majority of samples (1506/1526; 99%) (Supplementary Fig. 10 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…These features were used to develop a breast cancer-specific predictor of HRD known as HRDetect 9 . Application of this tool in primary tumors revealed that the prevalence of HRD extends beyond BRCA1/2 -deficient breast cancer tumors, and occurs at varying frequencies in different cancer types 10 . However, HRD rates in advanced metastatic cancer remain unclear, although these are the patients that are increasingly targeted with personalized treatments including PARP inhibitors for BRCA -deficiency 5 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was suggested that SBS6, SBS14, SBS15, SBS20, SBS21, SBS26, and SBS44 were MMR-deficiency related 6 . In an independent analytical exercise, only two MMRassociated signatures were identified 24 , although variations of the signatures were seen in different tissue types 24 . An experimental process would help to obtain clarity in this regard [8][9][10][11] .…”
Section: Gene-specific Characteristics Of Mutational Signatures Of MMmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Furthermore, gene-specific MMR signatures were seen in the International Cancer Genome Consortium (ICGC) cohort of >2,500 primary WGS cancers 24 . Indeed, biallelic MSH2/MSH6/MLH1 mutant tumors carried the same signature (RefSig MMR1) as ∆MSH2 /∆MSH6/∆MLH1 clones ( Figure 4B).…”
Section: Gene-specific Characteristics Of Mutational Signatures Of MMmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the analysis of a large number of spectra, the "extraction and attribution" approach focuses on simultaneously finding de-novo signatures and exposures, usually implemented as non-negative matrix factorization algorithms. [4][5][6] The "attributiononly" approach, in contrast, assumes an existing compendium and aims to find the exposures that optimally reconstruct the observed spectra using standard constrained linear optimization methods. 7,8 De-novo signature discovery is a challenging task with several known issues, among them: defining the optimal number of signatures, discovering weaker signatures in a background of stronger ones, and resolving spill-over (bleeding) between signatures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%