2017
DOI: 10.1109/access.2017.2751604
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Practical Evaluation of a Collaborative Learning Method for Engineering Project Subjects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
12
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
2
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The applied collaborative methodology has been adapted from the methodology used in the second-year project subject taught at the engineering school where the experience described in this study has been carried out [39]. The results of this experience regarding the acquisition of competencies are in agreement with those obtained in the evaluation of this methodology by Blanco et al [40].…”
Section: Academic Feedback Results and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…The applied collaborative methodology has been adapted from the methodology used in the second-year project subject taught at the engineering school where the experience described in this study has been carried out [39]. The results of this experience regarding the acquisition of competencies are in agreement with those obtained in the evaluation of this methodology by Blanco et al [40].…”
Section: Academic Feedback Results and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…The strategy followed in the present didactic experiment, which was applied in the industrial engineering program at a school of industrial engineering to incorporate BIM into technical projects, is based on the collaborative learning methodology. As such, the adaptation of the BIM methodology for training in technical projects towards different degrees in industrial engineering has been proposed in two phases [45] (Figure 1). Phase 1 The basic technical project subject was developed as part of the mandatory training plan for all degrees in industrial engineering during the basic technical project course (second year, fourth quarter).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Blanco et al [63] used an analytical hierarchical process (AHP) [64] as a tool to compare the adaptation of a collaborative methodology for technical project classes with the use of other methodologies. This process involved the intervention of three expert decision makers with academic and industrial experience in the VOLUME XX, 2017 5 preparation and implementation of technical projects.…”
Section: B Use Of Bim: Comparative Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table I shows the 10 criteria under consideration, the value of the relative importance of each criterion under certainty and uncertainty conditions, and its classification as a cost or a benefit to qualify the behavior of each course through TOPSIS and Fuzzy TOPSIS. As Blanco et al [63] note, these criteria are grouped into four categories: overall learning level of the student, level of development of other skills by the student, satisfaction level of the student (C) and student dropout rate for the subject (D). The overall learning level criterion is evaluated using the criteria subject passing rate (the number of students who pass the course compared with the number of students who are tested (A1)) and level of grades (average value of the grades from examinations (A2)).…”
Section: B Use Of Bim: Comparative Studymentioning
confidence: 99%