A Practical Evaluation of a High-Security Energy-Efficient Gateway for IoT Fog Computing Applications

Abstract

Fog computing extends cloud computing to the edge of a network enabling new Internet of Things (IoT) applications and services, which may involve critical data that require privacy and security. In an IoT fog computing system, three elements can be distinguished: IoT nodes that collect data, the cloud, and interconnected IoT gateways that exchange messages with the IoT nodes and with the cloud. This article focuses on securing IoT gateways, which are assumed to be constrained in terms of computational resources, but that are able to offload some processing from the cloud and to reduce the latency in the responses to the IoT nodes. However, it is usually taken for granted that IoT gateways have direct access to the electrical grid, which is not always the case: in mission-critical applications like natural disaster relief or environmental monitoring, it is common to deploy IoT nodes and gateways in large areas where electricity comes from solar or wind energy that charge the batteries that power every device. In this article, how to secure IoT gateway communications while minimizing power consumption is analyzed. The throughput and power consumption of Rivest–Shamir–Adleman (RSA) and Elliptic Curve Cryptography (ECC) are considered, since they are really popular, but have not been thoroughly analyzed when applied to IoT scenarios. Moreover, the most widespread Transport Layer Security (TLS) cipher suites use RSA as the main public key-exchange algorithm, but the key sizes needed are not practical for most IoT devices and cannot be scaled to high security levels. In contrast, ECC represents a much lighter and scalable alternative. Thus, RSA and ECC are compared for equivalent security levels, and power consumption and data throughput are measured using a testbed of IoT gateways. The measurements obtained indicate that, in the specific fog computing scenario proposed, ECC is clearly a much better alternative than RSA, obtaining energy consumption reductions of up to 50% and a data throughput that doubles RSA in most scenarios. These conclusions are then corroborated by a frame temporal analysis of Ethernet packets. In addition, current data compression algorithms are evaluated, concluding that, when dealing with the small payloads related to IoT applications, they do not pay off in terms of real data throughput and power consumption.

Towards Next Generation Teaching, Learning, and Context-Aware Applications for Higher Education: A Review on Blockchain, IoT, Fog and Edge Computing Enabled Smart Campuses and Universities

“…Some of the latest smart campus architectures have suggested the use of the different types of the edge computing paradigm (e.g., mobile edge computing or fog computing), which have already been successfully applied to other smart fields [39]. The main advantage of edge computing is its ability to offload part of the processing tasks from the cloud, delegating such tasks to the so-called edge devices, which are physically located close to the IoT nodes.…”

A Novel Blockchain Framework for Industrial IoT Edge Computing

“…Because of this diversity, it is difficult to develop a standard security protocol for all types of industrial internet devices and application systems [40]. According to IEC62443 standards [23], we can divide industrial internet as edge device layer, system control layer and management information layer, whose functions include computing, communication, sensing and driving functions. Through cloud-edge-end services, massive data storage, management and computation are clearly understood in this network architecture.…”

“…Wang et al [22] design a highly-efficient distributed tensor-train decomposition method for IIoT Big Data. Suárez-Albela et al [23] introduces blockchain technology to better reduce the operating cost of distributed energy management and resist threats and attacks.…”

A Review on IoT Deep Learning UAV Systems for Autonomous Obstacle Detection and Collision Avoidance

“…In the last years, UAV IoT architectures evolved towards more sophisticated architectures that essentially attempt to avoid the reliance on a remote cloud. This is due to the fact that a cloud may not scale properly, and thus it may constitute a bottleneck when a significant number of UAVs or IoT devices exchange communications with it [80]. In addition, cyberattacks may compromise the availability of the cloud servers, therefore preventing the UAV system from working properly.…”