2011
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0017915
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Practical Comparison of De Novo Genome Assembly Software Tools for Next-Generation Sequencing Technologies

Abstract: The advent of next-generation sequencing technologies is accompanied with the development of many whole-genome sequence assembly methods and software, especially for de novo fragment assembly. Due to the poor knowledge about the applicability and performance of these software tools, choosing a befitting assembler becomes a tough task. Here, we provide the information of adaptivity for each program, then above all, compare the performance of eight distinct tools against eight groups of simulated datasets from S… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
159
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 212 publications
(164 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(51 reference statements)
0
159
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, measuring assemblies using simulated reads from a number of sequences including two human chromosomes, they indicate that SOAPdenovo achieved a better N50 than ABySS whereas ABySS excelled on accuracy. The study also points out that assembly quality is sensitive to the number of base-call errors only when the coverage is low (i.e., before the coverage is so high that increasing it further does not significantly increase assembly quality) [57,58].…”
Section: Assessing Performancementioning
confidence: 90%
“…For example, measuring assemblies using simulated reads from a number of sequences including two human chromosomes, they indicate that SOAPdenovo achieved a better N50 than ABySS whereas ABySS excelled on accuracy. The study also points out that assembly quality is sensitive to the number of base-call errors only when the coverage is low (i.e., before the coverage is so high that increasing it further does not significantly increase assembly quality) [57,58].…”
Section: Assessing Performancementioning
confidence: 90%
“…To assemble new genomes, benchmark assembled reference genomes in other species are used. These include "de novo assembly algorithms" which are based on graph theory such as the de Bruijn graph formulation [28]. …”
Section: Soap3mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pyrosequencing (i.e. 454) data can be assembled using the GS Data Analysis Software package (http://www.454.com/products/analysis-software/), but the best program for de novo assembly of Illumina data is debated (for detailed discussion of assemblers see (Paszkiewicz & Studholme, 2010;W. Zhang, et al, 2011)).…”
Section: Bioinformatic Analysis Of Symbiont Genomes From Facs and Mdamentioning
confidence: 99%