2006
DOI: 10.4088/jcp.v67n1004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Practical Clinical Trial Comparing Haloperidol, Risperidone, and Olanzapine for the Acute Treatment of First-Episode Nonaffective Psychosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
76
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 142 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
4
76
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Clinical effectiveness is determined by both efficacy and tolerability, and it applies to patients in real-world treatment settings. In first episode of psychosis, similar clinical efficacy has been found between second generation of antipsychotics (SGAs) and low doses of first-generation antipsychotics (FGAs; Crespo-Facorro et al 2006, 2011Kahn et al 2008;Lieberman 1996;Lieberman et al 2003). The existence of differences in safety and tolerability leads to different treatment discontinuation rates among antipsychotics in the short term.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Clinical effectiveness is determined by both efficacy and tolerability, and it applies to patients in real-world treatment settings. In first episode of psychosis, similar clinical efficacy has been found between second generation of antipsychotics (SGAs) and low doses of first-generation antipsychotics (FGAs; Crespo-Facorro et al 2006, 2011Kahn et al 2008;Lieberman 1996;Lieberman et al 2003). The existence of differences in safety and tolerability leads to different treatment discontinuation rates among antipsychotics in the short term.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Detailed analysis of treatment efficacy at 6 weeks and 1 year in this population has been previously reported (Crespo-Facorro et al 2006, 2011.…”
Section: Secondary Outcome Measures: Efficacy and Safetymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies focused on the correlation of atypical antipsychotics with weight gain and insulin resistance have shown that occasionally there is no significant difference among the atypical antipsychotics and that Olanzapine and Clozapine have more involvement with weight gain and the disruption of glucose regulation [31][32][33][34] than other drugs. Crespo-Facorro et al determined that, although there is no difference in efficacy and tolerability, Olanzapine causes more weight gain compared to Risperidone [35], and Van Winkel et al have drawn attention to the fact that Clozapine carried the highest risk of changing plasma glucose levels among schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder patients using Risperidone, Aripiprazole or Clozapine [36]. Newcomer et al found clinically significant weight loss, a marked drop in TG and total cholesterol levels and a marked increase in HDL levels in obese patients who had been using Olanzapine, after 16 th week of switching to Aripipirazole [37].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These definitions were used in three studies that assessed haloperidol over six or 12 weeks (Crespo-Facorro et al, 2006;Lieberman et al, 2003b;Sanger et al, 1999). In all three studies the incidence of parkinsonism and akathisia in haloperidol-treated patients was approximately 50% over six to 12 weeks, which was approximately double or greater than the rate seen with the SGA comparator(s) with the differences being statistically significant (Table 2).…”
Section: Eps Rating Scale Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An analysis of the last observed value on a rating scale will ignore the impact of treatment and may obscure differences between antipsychotics. E m s le y e t a l ( 1 9 9 9 ) * S a n g e r e t a l ( 1 9 9 9 ) * L ie b e r m a n e t a l ( 2 0 0 3 b ) * G r e e n e t a l ( Lieberman et al (2003b) and Green et al (2006) are analyses at different time points from a single trial, as are Crespo-Facorro et al (2006. Möller et al (2008) is one of two publications from the GRSN trial; the second publication (Gaebel et al, 2007) assessed a longer time period, did not provide anticholinergic prescribing rates but reported that the difference between drugs was non-significant.…”
Section: Strengths and Weaknessesmentioning
confidence: 99%