This systematic review aimed to determine whether the risk of extrapyramidal side effects (EPS) differed between antipsychotic drugs used in first episode psychosis (FEP). We identified 11 RCTs comparing two or more antipsychotics in FEP and reporting on EPS. All trials assessed one or more second generation antipsychotics (SGAs), one assessed chlorpromazine, one zuclopenthixol and seven trials assessed haloperidol. Assessment and reporting of EPS varied. Compared with one or more SGA comparators, haloperidol was associated with significantly higher rates/severity of parkinsonism (seven trials) and akathisia (six trials) and greater use of anticholinergics (five trials) and beta-blockers (two trials). Two trials with low-dose haloperidol (≤ 4 mg) showed significantly worse EPS outcomes versus a SGA. Two of four long-term haloperidol trials (≥ 1 year) found a higher dyskinesia-risk with haloperidol versus olanzapine and risperidone respectively; the remaining two trials found no difference (various SGA comparators). There was an EPS advantage for clozapine versus chlorpromazine (one trial) and risperidone versus zuclopenthixol (one trial). There was little evidence of EPS-differences between SGAs, possibly reflecting use of low doses. We conclude that SGAs offer an EPS advantage over FGAs in FEP though the evidence largely relates to comparisons with haloperidol. Standardized assessment and reporting of EPS would assist future research.
Keywords
Method
Search strategyWe conducted a PubMed search, with no starting date limit, up to April 2011 using terms 'first episode schizophrenia' and 'antipsychotic' with limits specified as 'Humans, Randomized Controlled Trial and English'. The abstracts of all papers were reviewed to determine whether they met inclusion/exclusion criteria and if there was doubt the full paper was examined. Additional studies, identified through the reference list of papers in the primary search or known to the authors, were reviewed to see if they met inclusion/exclusion criteria.
Inclusion criteria1. RCT comparing two or more antipsychotic drugs. 2. Diagnosis of schizophrenia plus related disorders including schizophreniform disorder and schizoaffective disorder made according to standard criteria (any). 3. Patients explicitly described as 'first episode' by the authors. Although we did not define this further we recorded key criteria that the researchers employed to define this population, e.g. maximum age, maximum duration of illness and maximum cumulative antipsychotic treatment length. 4. EPS assessed using a standard rating scale. 5. Quantitative data on incidence or severity of EPS provided. 6. Paper published in English.
Exclusion criteria1. Studies of a single antipsychotic. 2. Non-randomized studies. 3. Studies of early onset schizophrenia (i.e. samples largely composed of subjects < 18 years old).
AnalysisKey data from the studies that met the inclusion/exclusion criteria were extracted. This included EPS ratings for parkinsonism, akathisia, dyskinesia and dystonia made us...