2004
DOI: 10.1190/1.1786900
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A practical approach to well-seismic data calibration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The velocity correlation method is used in this work. The uniqueness of this method is that the correlation between the borehole and the seismic data depends on the velocity values rather than on seismic amplitudes [28,29]. This method is effective with at least a single well and check-shot survey data and is better than the synthetic seismogram method in the following ways [28]:…”
Section: Seismic Well Tie and Horizon Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The velocity correlation method is used in this work. The uniqueness of this method is that the correlation between the borehole and the seismic data depends on the velocity values rather than on seismic amplitudes [28,29]. This method is effective with at least a single well and check-shot survey data and is better than the synthetic seismogram method in the following ways [28]:…”
Section: Seismic Well Tie and Horizon Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A separate velocity report (Appendix II) includes average, interval, and RMS velocities using down-hole sonic log data to interpolate between check-shot levels. A recalculation was made using the method of Linari (2004), to ensure accuracy of travel times corrected to a vertical well. Velocities were recalculated using the change in depth over the change in time (Δz/ Δt) for accuracy of the velocity model.…”
Section: Gorgas Wellmentioning
confidence: 99%