1990
DOI: 10.1016/0731-7085(90)80090-c
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A practical approach to method validation in pharmaceutical analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
51
0
2

Year Published

2004
2004
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 134 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
51
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The generally recommended degradation varies between 5-20% degradation. [24,25] Some conditions mostly used for forced degradation studies are presented in Table1. [26,27] www.wjpps.com …”
Section: Degradation Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The generally recommended degradation varies between 5-20% degradation. [24,25] Some conditions mostly used for forced degradation studies are presented in Table1. [26,27] www.wjpps.com …”
Section: Degradation Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, values anywhere between 5% to 20% degradation of the drug substance have been considered as reasonable and acceptable for validation of chromatographic assays 37,38 .…”
Section: How Much Is Enoughmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different validation tests were applied to assess the reliability of the proposed method (Caporal et al, 1990;Carr and Wahlich, 1990). Linearity of the method was determined for each compound for six concentrations ranging from 0.67 to 67.5 µg.L -1 for T, 0.83 to 83.3 µg.L -1 for TP and 0.92 to 92.1 µg.L -1 for TPP.…”
Section: Validation Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%