Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2014
DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2014.00076
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A practical approach to aid physician interpretation of clinically actionable predictive biomarker results in a multi-platform tumor profiling service

Abstract: Patients in whom the standard of care has failed or who have uncommon tumors for which no standard of care exists are often treated with drugs selected based on the physician’s best guess. The rate of success for this method is generally low. With the advent of fast, affordable tumor profiling technologies, and a growth in the understanding of predictive biomarkers, it is now possible to identify drugs potentially associated with clinical benefit for such patients. We present the Caris approach to evidence-bas… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(15 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Samples sent to FM underwent whole-genome shotgun library construction with hybridization–based capture for 4,557 exons from 287 cancer related genes and 47 introns from 19 genes frequently involved in DNA rearrangements. Samples sent to CMI underwent an established technology platforms to measure a panel of carefully selected biomarkers including immunohistochemistry (IHC), fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH), polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and direct gene sequencing [ 28 ]. RG paired NGS with FISH and RNA expression markers to identify any clinically targetable genetic alteration in the samples.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Samples sent to FM underwent whole-genome shotgun library construction with hybridization–based capture for 4,557 exons from 287 cancer related genes and 47 introns from 19 genes frequently involved in DNA rearrangements. Samples sent to CMI underwent an established technology platforms to measure a panel of carefully selected biomarkers including immunohistochemistry (IHC), fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH), polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and direct gene sequencing [ 28 ]. RG paired NGS with FISH and RNA expression markers to identify any clinically targetable genetic alteration in the samples.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These real-time results being designed for the GA will not only report the answers to the specific questions but also calculate a frailty index [48] , as well as guideline-recommended interventions (see Table 2 ). The result printouts are modeled to be similar to tumor molecular testing results which are delivered both with the relevant mutated and non-mutated genes as well as the systemic agents that may target those mutations [56] . This program would thus make it easier for radiation oncologists without training in geriatrics to interpret and react to the results of the GA appropriately.…”
Section: Translation Into a Radiation Oncology Clinicmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other successful clinical examples of genetic analysis for personalized medicine were published in 2014 by Caris company[32]. Using the Caris Molecular Intelligence (CMI) platform - a combination of genome sequencing, FISH (fluorescence in situ hybridization method) and PCR the authors analyzed two patients.…”
Section: Encouraging Case Studies and Design Of Clinical Trialsmentioning
confidence: 99%