2016
DOI: 10.1179/1743277414y.0000000091
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Practical Algorithm for the External Annotation of Area Features

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this case, the area features are assumed as point features. For example, Rylov and Reimer [21] proposed a novel algorithm that placed the label outside the area feature if the feature did not have enough internal space. In many prior automatic label placement algorithms, the feature label was often restricted to a specific area around features.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, the area features are assumed as point features. For example, Rylov and Reimer [21] proposed a novel algorithm that placed the label outside the area feature if the feature did not have enough internal space. In many prior automatic label placement algorithms, the feature label was often restricted to a specific area around features.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The problem of labeling linear features was addressed among others in Barrault and Lecordix (1995), Edmondson et al (1996) and Chirié (2000). Van Roessel (1989), Barrault (2001), and Rylov and Reimer (2014b) proposed methods for labeling areal features. The problem of labeling feature groups has also received some attention.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the recent literature [21] has adopted the so-called skeleton method in which the labels should be placed on skeleton curves of the areas. Rylov and Reimer [22] introduced a novel and efficient algorithm for labeling area features externally, i.e., outside the polygonal boundary, and claimed to achieve efficient label placement that is close to the quality of manually produced cartographic products.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%