2022
DOI: 10.1155/2022/9421400
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Power Forecasting Method for Ultra-Short-Term Photovoltaic Power Generation Using Transformer Model

Abstract: The volatility of solar energy, geographic location, and weather factors continues to affect the stability of photovoltaic power generation, reliable and accurate photovoltaic power prediction methods not only effectively reduce the operating cost of the photovoltaic system but also provide reliable data support for the energy scheduling of the light storage microgrid, improve the stability of the photovoltaic system, and provide important help for the optimization operation of the photovoltaic system. Therefo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using the mean error as an indicator, the results show that the improved RBFN has a mean error of 0.0544 kW, which is 13% lower than the traditional RBFN method. Chang [105] used the real historical output power data to analyze the RBFN method, and the results show that the average absolute percentage error of RBFN method is 4.6785%, and the maximum absolute percentage deviation is 9.909 75%.…”
Section: Single Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the mean error as an indicator, the results show that the improved RBFN has a mean error of 0.0544 kW, which is 13% lower than the traditional RBFN method. Chang [105] used the real historical output power data to analyze the RBFN method, and the results show that the average absolute percentage error of RBFN method is 4.6785%, and the maximum absolute percentage deviation is 9.909 75%.…”
Section: Single Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Use error indicators, the average root error (RMSE), average absolute error (MAE), average absolute percentage error (MAPE), and fittings (R2) evaluate the results to end the algorithm. Among them, the smaller the RMSE, MAE, and MAPE indicators, the higher the predictive accuracy of the model; the closer to the R2, the higher the prediction accuracy, the more the calculation formula of each indicator is as follows Literature [14], [15] .…”
Section: Error Indicatormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The selection of these variables depends on their correlations with main PV power production, availability, and ease of access to such data. The most common variable used is measured power, employed in 67% of the recently published articles, such as [79] , [80] , [81] , [82] , [83] . This direct method captures the energy production behavior at specific times and locations.…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%