2011
DOI: 10.1080/02786826.2010.533214
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Potential Soot Mass Determination Method from Resistivity Measurement of Thermophoretically Deposited Soot

Abstract: Miniaturized detection systems for nanometer-sized airborne particles are in demand, for example in applications for onboard diagnostics downstream particulate filters in modern diesel engines. A soot sensor based on resistivity measurements was developed and characterized. This involved generation of soot particles using a quenched co-flow diffusion flame; depositing the particles onto a sensor substrate using thermophoresis and particle detection using a finger electrode structure, patterned on thermally oxi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

3
36
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
3
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(3)). This is similar to observations made previously in studies employing diesel exhaust, as well as for flame soot generators (Park et al, 2003;Maricq & Xu, 2004;Olfert et al, 2007;Malik et al, 2011a). The mass-mobility exponents reported by Park et al (2003) for a John Deere engine, at 10-75% load, measured using the DMA-APM technique were 2.33-2.41 with effective densities ranging from 1.20 g/cm 3 for 50 nm particles down to 0.30 for 300 nm particles.…”
Section: Particle Morphology and Volatilitysupporting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(3)). This is similar to observations made previously in studies employing diesel exhaust, as well as for flame soot generators (Park et al, 2003;Maricq & Xu, 2004;Olfert et al, 2007;Malik et al, 2011a). The mass-mobility exponents reported by Park et al (2003) for a John Deere engine, at 10-75% load, measured using the DMA-APM technique were 2.33-2.41 with effective densities ranging from 1.20 g/cm 3 for 50 nm particles down to 0.30 for 300 nm particles.…”
Section: Particle Morphology and Volatilitysupporting
confidence: 80%
“…For agglomerates formed in diffusion limited processes, the relation between m agg and d me has been shown in several previous studies (Park et al, 2003;Maricq & Xu, 2004;Olfert et al, 2007;Pagels et al, 2009;Malik et al, 2011a) The set-up is used for measuring particle effective density of agglomerates and volatile mass fraction on-line. Particles with a single d me are selected with the DMA and thereafter their mass is measured by the APM.…”
Section: Particle Morphology Effective Density and Volatilitymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The APM has been used, often in combination with a differential mobility analyzer (DMA), for evaluation of various particle properties such as "effective" density (McMurry et al 2002;Geller et al 2006;Malloy et al 2009;Liu et al 2012), morphology through estimation of the mass-mobility exponent (Park et al 2003a; Ku et al 2006;Kim et al 2009;Nakao et al 2011;Scheckman and McMurry 2011;Torvela et al 2011;Eggersdorfer et al 2012;Guha et al 2012;Ku and Evans 2012), the mixing ratio of internally-mixed particles (Sakurai et al 2003;Park et al 2008;Khalizov et al 2009;Ma and Zachariah 2009), material density (Park et al 2004;Kuwata et al 2012), particulate mass concentration (Park et al 2003b;Saito et al 2008), mass (Kuwata et al 2009;Lall et al 2009), volume (Lall et al 2008), and porosity (Lee et al 2011). The APM can also be used as a generator of particles having a specified mass (Malik et al 2011;Moteki et al 2011;Laborde et al 2012;Beranek et al 2012). A variant of the APM called the Couette Particle Mass Analyzer (CPMA) has been developed (Olfert and Collings 2005;Olfert et al 2006), and used for similar purposes (Olfert et al 2007;Cross et al 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A new and innovative way of managing the temperature of a sensor device protruding into hot gas flows was proposed and patented in 2009 [6][7] [8]. The concept consists of a closed thermally conductive pipe, sealed at both ends.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%