2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2022.123468
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A potent numerical model coupled with multi-objective NSGA-II algorithm for the optimal design of Stirling engine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sun et al [ 39 ] used the operating current, lower TE element module height and ratio of the HEX channel width to fin thickness as optimization variables, and carried out two-objective optimization of the exergy efficiency and irreversibility of two-stage series and parallel TE refrigerators. The MOO of NSGA-II is also widely used in the Brayton cycle [ 40 ], Stirling–Otto combined cycle [ 41 ], Organic Rankine cycle [ 42 ], Stirling cycle [ 43 , 44 ], etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sun et al [ 39 ] used the operating current, lower TE element module height and ratio of the HEX channel width to fin thickness as optimization variables, and carried out two-objective optimization of the exergy efficiency and irreversibility of two-stage series and parallel TE refrigerators. The MOO of NSGA-II is also widely used in the Brayton cycle [ 40 ], Stirling–Otto combined cycle [ 41 ], Organic Rankine cycle [ 42 ], Stirling cycle [ 43 , 44 ], etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to take different performance indicators into account and obtain the optimal design scheme, Deb et al [ 90 ] proposed the non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm II (NSGA-II), which overcame the three shortcomings of NSGA, including the high computational complexity of non-dominated sorting, the lack of elite strategies, and the need to specify shared parameters. NSGA-II was widely used for the multi-objective optimization (MOO) of various thermodynamic cycles [ 91 , 92 , 93 , 94 , 95 , 96 , 97 , 98 , 99 ]. The Brayton cycle [ 91 ] and Stirling-Otto combined cycle [ 92 ] were optimized by MOO, and the utilized optimization objectives were power output and thermal efficiency; the optimization results were obtained and compared by applying different decision-making approaches.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ESE heat engine [ 96 ] was optimized by MOO and the utilized optimization objectives were ecological function, power output, efficient power, and thermal efficiency. Stirling engines [ 97 , 98 ], the membrane reactor [ 99 ], and the bidirectional-ribbed microchannel [ 100 ] were also optimized by applying MOO; and the schemes with less contradictions and conflicts were obtained.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shakouri et al [ 65 ] performed MOO research on solid oxide fuel cell-SHE cycles with three OOs of , exergy efficiency, and exergy destruction density. Ahmed et al [ 66 ] considered such parameters as heat-source temperature, engine frequency, average effective pressure, piston diameter, and regenerator grid line diameter, and took , , and losses as OOs to perform MOO on SHE cycles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with the previous MOO research of different SHE cycles [ 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 , 66 , 69 ], the major contribution of this paper is that, firstly, the effects of the linear phenomenological HTL, which is different from Newton’s HTL, on the performance of the SHE are studied, and the expressions of four OOs are derived. It is also found that , , and are obviously different from those in reference [ 69 ] referring to Newton’s HTL; secondly, a more realistic cycle model with various heat and mechanical losses is adopted; and, finally, different OOs are introduced.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%