2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104338
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A postmortem of forest policy dynamics of Nepal

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nepal is one of the leading countries for embracing community forestry ( Nuberg et al, 2019 ) and allowing multi-stakeholder engagement in forestry-related decision-making ( Laudari et al, 2020b ). The forestry sector, particularly the community forestry of the country has a significant contribution to poverty reduction and rural development ( Chhetri, 2009 ), forest cover enhancement and regrowth ( Tripathi et al, 2020 ) and contributing 80 targets of the sustainable development goals ( Aryal et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nepal is one of the leading countries for embracing community forestry ( Nuberg et al, 2019 ) and allowing multi-stakeholder engagement in forestry-related decision-making ( Laudari et al, 2020b ). The forestry sector, particularly the community forestry of the country has a significant contribution to poverty reduction and rural development ( Chhetri, 2009 ), forest cover enhancement and regrowth ( Tripathi et al, 2020 ) and contributing 80 targets of the sustainable development goals ( Aryal et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1950s: The Private Forest Nationalization Act 1957 has always been regarded as a major policy instrument for fueling deforestation in many parts of Nepal [37]. The act transformed the forest management under customary practices into open access resources.…”
Section: Policy Discourse and Its Interaction With Forest Degradation And Restoration Outcomes: A Decadal Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Forest restoration initiatives implemented at various scales (national and subnational) lack horizontal and vertical coordination among governments and stakeholders. Strengthening horizontal and vertical cooperation and coordination mechanisms (horizontal and vertical) among three-tier governments is of utmost importance to make the stakeholders aware of shared but differentiated responsibilities [37] of forest and ecosystem restoration processes and practices [54]. At the provincial and local level, coordination and cooperation mechanisms can be set up by involving relevant stakeholders including local people and the private sector.…”
Section: Strengthen Horizontal and Vertical Cooperation Mechanisms To Implement And Monitor Restoration Activitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1950s: The Private Forest Nationalization Act 1957 has always been regarded as a major policy instrument for fueling deforestation in many parts of Nepal [34]. The act transformed the forest management under customary practices into open access resources.…”
Section: Context Of Nepal's Teraimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Forest restoration initiatives implemented at various scales (national and subnational) lack horizontal and vertical coordination among the governments and with stakeholders. Strengthening horizontal and vertical cooperation and coordination mechanism (horizontal and vertical) among three-tier governments is of utmost importance to make the stakeholders aware of shared but differentiated responsibilities [34] on forest and ecosystem restoration processes and practices [47]. At the provincial and local level, coordination and cooperation mechanisms can be set up by involving relevant stakeholders including local people and the private sector.…”
Section: Strengthen Horizontal and Vertical Cooperation Mechanism To Implement And Monitor Restoration Activitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%