2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0045-7825(99)00099-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A posteriori error estimation for finite-volume solutions of hyperbolic conservation laws

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
53
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many works studying the a posteriori error estimate base on mathematical arguments [28]. But paradoxically, to our knowledge, very few works use a physical criterion [5]  the numerical density of entropy production.…”
Section: Mesh Refinement Criterionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many works studying the a posteriori error estimate base on mathematical arguments [28]. But paradoxically, to our knowledge, very few works use a physical criterion [5]  the numerical density of entropy production.…”
Section: Mesh Refinement Criterionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The source of error is the residual of the approximate solution, and, in the nonlinear case, the error evolves by a different differential operator than the solution. In the linear error transport approach [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18], the differential operator on the left-hand side of (4) is linearized aboutũ , which is a reasonable assumption so long as |e(x, t)| |u(x, t)| . In practice, and in some very important cases, this is not valid, and such a linearization becomes questionable.…”
Section: Basic Conceptsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the use of the same orders for primal and error equation discretizations results in asymptotically correct error estimates so long as the residual approximation is sufficiently accurate, as demonstrated in [10,16]. The evaluation of the residual has been a primary focus of investigation in the literature to date.…”
Section: Basic Conceptsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations