2019
DOI: 10.1002/num.22443
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A posteriori error estimate for discontinuous Galerkin finite element method on polytopal mesh

Abstract: In this work, we derive a posteriori error estimates for discontinuous Galerkin finite element method on polytopal mesh. We construct a reliable and efficient a posteriori error estimator on general polygonal or polyhedral meshes. An adaptive algorithm based on the error estimator and DG method is proposed to solve a variety of test problems. Numerical experiments are performed to illustrate the effectiveness of the algorithm.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Polygonal/polyhedral meshes don't require any postprocessing within the adaptive procedure, so polygonal/polyhedral mesh refinement is more popular than traditional triangular/tetrahedral mesh one. Several numerical discretization methods which admit polygonal/polyhedral meshes have been proposed within the current literatures; here we mention DG-FEMs [12], Mimetic Finite Difference (MFD) methods [4], Hybrid High-Order (HHO) methods [49], locally conservative methods [36], virtual FEMs [25,38], finite volume methods [8], WG-FEMs [1,21,27], and so forth. HDG, HHO and WG-FEM are closely related, share many aspects in common and are equivalent in some special cases.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Polygonal/polyhedral meshes don't require any postprocessing within the adaptive procedure, so polygonal/polyhedral mesh refinement is more popular than traditional triangular/tetrahedral mesh one. Several numerical discretization methods which admit polygonal/polyhedral meshes have been proposed within the current literatures; here we mention DG-FEMs [12], Mimetic Finite Difference (MFD) methods [4], Hybrid High-Order (HHO) methods [49], locally conservative methods [36], virtual FEMs [25,38], finite volume methods [8], WG-FEMs [1,21,27], and so forth. HDG, HHO and WG-FEM are closely related, share many aspects in common and are equivalent in some special cases.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…His articles focus mainly on the LDG methods for one-dimensional or two-dimensional domains discretised with Cartesian grids. Another approach is proposed in 62 where the error in the elements is based on the oscillations in the right-hand side function when projected to the approximation space.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Residual-type a posteriori error bounds for interior penalty dG methods on composite/polytopic meshes appeared in [26,18]. Also, in the context of virtual element methods, corresponding bounds are proven in [12,16], while for the weak Galerkin approach, an a posteriori error analysis can be found in [34].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of related results followed, improving various aspects of the theory; for instance, see [3,28,15,40,1,6,27,20,32]. A key reason for the aforementioned restrictive assumption that all elemental faces are of comparable size to the element diameter in existing a posteriori error analysis for polytopic dG methods [26,18] is exactly the lack fo availability of a stability result corresponding to [30,Theorem 2.2] for polytopic element meshes containing elements with small faces.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%