2009
DOI: 10.1007/s12041-009-0036-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A possible tradeoff between developmental rate and pathogen resistance in Drosophila melanogaster

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
10
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
(20 reference statements)
1
10
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Kraaijeveld et al (2001) hypothesized that the common embryonic origin of the head muscles (used in feeding) and the hemopoietic organ (that produces the hemocytes that are responsible for the cellular immune response) may provide a proximate explanation for any developmental trade-offs in Drosophila. Thus, the relatively smaller size of males in the presence of pathogens is consistent with previous work that has found that flies experimentally evolved in an immunologically challenging environment also exhibited lower feeding rates (Fellowes et al 1999), and that there are developmental trade-offs between growth and immunocompetence (Modak et al 2009). The fact that this phenomenon was only observed in male offspring may reflect the effects of sex-specific selective pressures.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Kraaijeveld et al (2001) hypothesized that the common embryonic origin of the head muscles (used in feeding) and the hemopoietic organ (that produces the hemocytes that are responsible for the cellular immune response) may provide a proximate explanation for any developmental trade-offs in Drosophila. Thus, the relatively smaller size of males in the presence of pathogens is consistent with previous work that has found that flies experimentally evolved in an immunologically challenging environment also exhibited lower feeding rates (Fellowes et al 1999), and that there are developmental trade-offs between growth and immunocompetence (Modak et al 2009). The fact that this phenomenon was only observed in male offspring may reflect the effects of sex-specific selective pressures.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…However, both male and female flies in the experimental populations were less resistant to immunological challenge from Escherichia coli than those from the control populations. More recently, Modak et al (2009) compared the resistance to E. coli in flies from populations that had been selected for faster development with those from corresponding control populations. They found that flies from the fast-selected lines exhibited higher rates of pathogen-induced mortality than did those from controls, suggestive of a genetic correlation between development rate and pathogen resistance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Populations of D. melanogaster have been used for artificial selection for resistance to infection by microbes or parasitoids, and the evolution of other fitness-related traits is a typical result of such studies (summarized by McKean and Lazzaro [16]). Conversely, artificial selection on life history traits can affect immunity; Modak et al [17] documented that D. melanogaster selected for decreased development time exhibited a shorter time to death following introduction of E. coli than unselected controls. In the present study, lines of D. melanogaster selected for survival after introduction of B. cereus tended to have decreased incidence of progeny that acquired DMelSV.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This notion underlies the theory of optimal immune defense (e.g., Viney et al 2005;Donnelly et al 2017), as well as some of the theories linking heritable pathogen resistance with sexually selected traits (Folstad and Karter 1992;Westneat and Birkhead 1998;Adamo and Spiteri 2005). It is supported by extensive evidence from genetic analyses and selection experiments that found negative genetic correlations between pathogen resistance and survival, growth, developmental rate, fecundity or longevity, often amplified under nutritional or other stress (Kraaijeveld and Godfray 2008;Vorburger et al 2008;Modak et al 2009;Ye et al 2009;Hall et al 2010;Boots 2011;Duncan et al 2011;Auld et al 2013;Vijendravarma et al 2015;McGonigle et al 2017;McNamara and Simmons 2017;Bartlett et al 2018; older studies reviewed in Lazzaro and Little 2009).…”
mentioning
confidence: 87%