2007
DOI: 10.1080/08912960600885631
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A possible case of necrotizing dermatitis in the crocodylianDiplocynodon, from the Oligocene of the Isle of Wight, United Kingdom

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The erosive nature of the superficial surface of this osteoderm may be related to infectious or parasitic causes (Wolff et al, 2007). Erosive bone surfaces were recognized by Wolff et al (2007) in two crocodilian osteoderms, and interpreted as a possible case of necrotizing dermatitis.…”
Section: Osteoderm Pathologiesmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The erosive nature of the superficial surface of this osteoderm may be related to infectious or parasitic causes (Wolff et al, 2007). Erosive bone surfaces were recognized by Wolff et al (2007) in two crocodilian osteoderms, and interpreted as a possible case of necrotizing dermatitis.…”
Section: Osteoderm Pathologiesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The erosive nature of the superficial surface of this osteoderm may be related to infectious or parasitic causes (Wolff et al, 2007). Erosive bone surfaces were recognized by Wolff et al (2007) in two crocodilian osteoderms, and interpreted as a possible case of necrotizing dermatitis. The cavities developed in the titanosaur osteoderm are, nevertheless, different from those described for the crocodilian osteoderms, where the specimen bears a porous, erosive branching channel that distorts over 60% of the preserved superficial surface area (Wolff et al, 2007).…”
Section: Osteoderm Pathologiesmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Up to now, the most common pathologies proposed in the literature for crocodylian fossil taxa include joint lesions Erickson 1985, 1998;Rothschild 2008), infections (Sawyer and Erickson 1985;Rothschild 2008), exostoses (Sawyer and Erickson 1998), tumors (Rothschild 2008), fractures Erickson 1985, 1998;Rothschild 2008;Mackness et al 2010) and unspecific injuries (e.g. Neill 1971), digital proliferative osteitis (Martínez-Silvestre et al 2015), spondylitis deformans (Ruffer 1920) and necrotizing dermatitis (Wolff et al 2007). In addition, several diseases have also been identified in non-crocodylian fossil crocodyliforms (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the correct identification of a palaeopathology can be helpful to our understanding of the origin, distribution, and evolution of a disease, and at the same time, help to understand a number of issues such as predator−prey relationships, intraspecific interactions, and disease or trauma experienced by an animal (e.g. Rothschild & Martin, 1993; Rothschild et al ., 1998; Sawyer & Erickson, 1998; Tanke & Currie, 1998; Rothschild, Witzke & Hershkovitz, 1999; Hanna, 2002; Wolff, Fowler & Bonde, 2007). However, when studying diseases in fossil remains one of the major problems that we find is distinguishing them from biostratinomic and diagenetic damage (post‐mortem abnormal modifications resulting from mechanical, environmental, biological, and/or chemical processes).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%