2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2021.110254
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A positivity-preserving and conservative intersection-distribution-based remapping algorithm for staggered ALE hydrodynamics on arbitrary meshes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…High-order schemes that can be seen as linear in the sense of Godunov [34], may develop spurious oscillations in presence of discontinuities. In order to prevent this phenomenon, in the case of a DG discretization we adopt an a posteriori limiting procedure based on the MOOD paradigm [15,47,31]: we first apply our unlimited ALE-DG scheme everywhere, and then (a posteriori), at the end of each timestep, we check the reliability of the obtained solution in each cell against physical and numerical admissibility criteria, such as floating point exceptions, violation of positivity or violation of a relaxed discrete maximum principle (and see [35,39] for further criteria). Next, we mark as troubled those cells where the DG solution cannot be accepted.…”
Section: A Posteriori Sub-cell Fv Limitermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High-order schemes that can be seen as linear in the sense of Godunov [34], may develop spurious oscillations in presence of discontinuities. In order to prevent this phenomenon, in the case of a DG discretization we adopt an a posteriori limiting procedure based on the MOOD paradigm [15,47,31]: we first apply our unlimited ALE-DG scheme everywhere, and then (a posteriori), at the end of each timestep, we check the reliability of the obtained solution in each cell against physical and numerical admissibility criteria, such as floating point exceptions, violation of positivity or violation of a relaxed discrete maximum principle (and see [35,39] for further criteria). Next, we mark as troubled those cells where the DG solution cannot be accepted.…”
Section: A Posteriori Sub-cell Fv Limitermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this order value simulation, the top and front of the model are defined as free surfaces, and the remaining surfaces of the model are set as non-reflective boundary conditions to avoid stress wave reflection at the boundary (Figure 3). Choosing the ALE (Arbitrary Lagrangian Eulerian) algorithm will realize the fluid-solid coupling dynamic analysis to overcome the numerical calculation difficulties caused by the element distortion (Kenamond et al, 2021). In this number value simulation, the total initiation time of each group of calculation models is less than 120 ms.…”
Section: Numerical Simulation Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this reason, during the last decades many different approaches that relax the constraint of exact match between fluid flow and mesh motion have been developed, while at the same time aiming to retaining the match as closely as possible. Having considered the wide class of meshless methods and SPH methods [121,168,110], which are remarkably flexible from a geometrical point of view but are generally less accurate than their mesh-based counterparts, we focus here on the so-called Arbitrary-Lagrangian-Eulerian (ALE) schemes, introduced in their indirect form in [126,125,17] and then further developed for example in [154,18,15,10,172,109,119]. These methods alternate a Lagrangian phase with a rezoning procedure (where the mesh quality is optimized) and then a remapping phase, where the numerical solution defined on the old Lagrangian mesh is transferred onto the new optimized grid.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%