2019
DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/252/3/032135
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Position Sensorless Control Strategy for SPMSM Based on an Improved Sliding Mode Observer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…EKF 15 , 16 matrix has a large amount of calculation, high complexity, poor real-time performance, and large delay. MRAS 17 , 18 requires accurate model feedback parameters and cannot be used in large speed ranges; among them, SMO 19 24 is simpler than other methods. SMO has low requirements for the accuracy of the system model, is insensitive to parameter changes and external interference, and has strong robustness.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…EKF 15 , 16 matrix has a large amount of calculation, high complexity, poor real-time performance, and large delay. MRAS 17 , 18 requires accurate model feedback parameters and cannot be used in large speed ranges; among them, SMO 19 24 is simpler than other methods. SMO has low requirements for the accuracy of the system model, is insensitive to parameter changes and external interference, and has strong robustness.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second type uses the motor speed parameters (such as the back-EMF) in the motor fundamental excitation mathematical model to estimate the rotor position and speed, which has significant dynamic performance but is only suitable for the operation range of medium and high-speed. The commonly used fundamental back-EMF observation algorithms include SMO [6][7][8][9], model reference adaptive [10][11], and extended Kalman filter [12]. SMO has been widely studied because of its simple implementation, insensitivity to parameter changes, and external interference [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%