1997
DOI: 10.1007/bf02765270
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A population size estimate of the finless porpoise, Neophocaena phocaenoides, from aerial sighting surveys in Ariake Sound and Tachibana Bay, Japan

Abstract: We estimated the population size of the finless porpoise (Neophocaena phocaenoides) in Ariake Sound and Tachibana Bay of western Kyushu, southwestern Japan, from aerial sighting surveys using line transect methods. All 12 surveys were conducted from May 1993 to May 1994 (8 in Ariake Sound and 4 in Tachibana Bay). In addition to these, 14 surveys were also carried out to obtain information on porpoise occurrence in Tachibana Bay (5 surveys) and in neighboring Sumo Nada (5) and Yatsushiro Sound (4). In Ariake So… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
22
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The sampling bias in the interviewbased survey to estimate the number of by caught porpoises was not incorporated into this study. The most recent available abundance estimate in Ariake Sound and Tachibana Bay was provided from observations taken in 1993 and 1994 (Yoshida et al 1997), and it may be too old to estimate the bycatch mortality rate in 2007 and 2008, or to use as the current population size. Our results suggest that predictions are sensitive to the estimate of M (Table 2; Scenarios I and II).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The sampling bias in the interviewbased survey to estimate the number of by caught porpoises was not incorporated into this study. The most recent available abundance estimate in Ariake Sound and Tachibana Bay was provided from observations taken in 1993 and 1994 (Yoshida et al 1997), and it may be too old to estimate the bycatch mortality rate in 2007 and 2008, or to use as the current population size. Our results suggest that predictions are sensitive to the estimate of M (Table 2; Scenarios I and II).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the Ariake Sound and Tachibana Bay population, the most recent abundance estimate is 3093 ind. (coefficient of variation [CV] = 15.7%) in 1993 and 1994 (Yoshida et al 1997); 250 ind. (CV = 22.3%) were estimated to be bycaught annually during gill net fishing .…”
Section: Demographic Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…1). This population, whose size in 1993/1994 was estimated at 3093 individuals (Yoshida et al 1997), suffers mortalities in bottom-set and drift gillnets (M. Shirakihara et al 1993Shirakihara et al , 2008. To clarify the magnitude of bycatch in gillnet fisheries for this population, we conducted interview-based surveys among fishermen in 2007 and 2008.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%