2016
DOI: 10.1152/jn.01046.2015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A population of gap junction-coupled neurons drives recurrent network activity in a developing visual circuit

Abstract: Liu Z, Ciarleglio CM, Hamodi AS, Aizenman CD, Pratt KG. A population of gap junction-coupled neurons drives recurrent network activity in a developing visual circuit.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding suggests that developing tectal networks in Xenopus tadpoles may employ a yet undescribed homeostatic mechanism to balance relative abundance and strength of direct and recurrent synaptic connections in principal tectal cells, keeping it in the range that supports collision avoidance computations. Our modeling data also suggests that collision detection may be further improved by recurrent feedback inhibition (Khakhalin et al, 2014; Liu et al, 2016), especially for networks that are tightly connected and susceptible to epileptiform activity, or when the level of spontaneous neuronal noise in the system is high. We hypothesize that delayed feedback inhibition may act as a safeguard, temporally limiting recurrent activity in the network, and thus allowing for strong integration between direct and recurrent inputs within the window before the inhibition onset, without the risk of succumbing to epileptiform activity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This finding suggests that developing tectal networks in Xenopus tadpoles may employ a yet undescribed homeostatic mechanism to balance relative abundance and strength of direct and recurrent synaptic connections in principal tectal cells, keeping it in the range that supports collision avoidance computations. Our modeling data also suggests that collision detection may be further improved by recurrent feedback inhibition (Khakhalin et al, 2014; Liu et al, 2016), especially for networks that are tightly connected and susceptible to epileptiform activity, or when the level of spontaneous neuronal noise in the system is high. We hypothesize that delayed feedback inhibition may act as a safeguard, temporally limiting recurrent activity in the network, and thus allowing for strong integration between direct and recurrent inputs within the window before the inhibition onset, without the risk of succumbing to epileptiform activity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…As the topology of recurrent connections in the tadpole tectum is not known (Pratt et al, 2008; Liu et al, 2016), we considered three possible configurations (Figure 2B): uniform , with random connections across the entire network and uniformly distributed connection weights; local , with connections spanning 5 nearby cells in each direction, and with average strength decreasing with distance; and scale-free : a small-world network with a few strongly connected hub cells linking the entire network in a set of connected clusters (Barabasi and Albert, 1999). All connectivity profiles were normalized by synaptic strength, so that the average sum of synaptic inputs received by tectal cells was same in each network type, regardless of its topology.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Contrary to our expectations, and in contrast to what is known about visual inputs to the tectum (Tao and Poo, 2005), the intra-tectal connectivity did not become more compact in development (p t =0.7). This suggests that tectal networks rely on relatively far-reaching recurrent connections to integrate visual information across the visual field (Baginskas and Kuras, 2009;Liu et al, 2016;Jang et al, 2016). A.…”
Section: Network Reconstructionmentioning
confidence: 99%