2014
DOI: 10.1007/s00500-014-1240-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A polynomial based algorithm for detection of embolism

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Specifically, upon examining the classifier weights, it may be seen that there is greater emphasis on unidirectionality. The attained high classification sensitivity and specificity are on par with those reported in prior literature [9], [13], [38], [39]. For instance, Darbellay et al [13] reported embolus classification sensitivity of 95% and associated specificity of 97% on a testing data set comprising 600 emboli and 530 artifacts.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 62%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Specifically, upon examining the classifier weights, it may be seen that there is greater emphasis on unidirectionality. The attained high classification sensitivity and specificity are on par with those reported in prior literature [9], [13], [38], [39]. For instance, Darbellay et al [13] reported embolus classification sensitivity of 95% and associated specificity of 97% on a testing data set comprising 600 emboli and 530 artifacts.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…For instance, Darbellay et al [13] reported embolus classification sensitivity of 95% and associated specificity of 97% on a testing data set comprising 600 emboli and 530 artifacts. Using seven classification features, Sombune et al [39] recently reported an average classification sensitivity of 91.5%, average specificity of 90.0%, and average accuracy of 90.5%, outperforming the work by Karahoca and Tunga [38]. Brucher and Russel [9] previously proposed using four features in a decision tree: difference in Doppler shift due to dual-frequency insonation (2 and 2.5 MHz), a measure of expected signal duration, emboli presence in a second depth, and unidirectionality.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…ANFIS was then used to classify the extracted features as non-ES or ES. The results of this study significantly outperformed the results from the combination of features and algorithms of Karahoca and Tunga [15]. In another prior study, we investigated the use of a deep convolutional neural network (CNN) as a tool for cerebral ES detection [13].…”
Section: A Stroke Screening Methodsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Furthermore, since the early 2000s, several works have used signal processing and machine learning techniques to detect and classify CE. Signal processing techniques mainly focus on frequency-based approaches using Fourier or wavelet transforms, often combined with machine learning techniques such as support vector machines, random forest, naive Bayes, or fuzzy-rules based classifiers [3]- [6]. Deep learning techniques often use time-frequency representations (TFRs) combined with convolutional neural networks (CNN) [7], [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%