Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)]2 is a structurally and functionally unique lipoprotein consisting of the glycoprotein apolipoprotein(a) [Apo(a)] covalently linked to LDL (1 ). Soon after its discovery in 1963 by Berg, Lp(a) was shown in case-control studies to be associated with coronary heart disease (CHD) (2 ). Since then, it has received widespread interest, and a large database has been accumulated concerning its potential role as a predictor of cardiovascular risk. Recently, a metaanalysis, summarizing results of 36 prospective long-term studies with a total of 126 634 participants, was reported by the Emerging Risk Factors Collaboration (3 ). It confirmed a significant and independent association between increased Lp(a) concentrations and risk of CHD, resulting in a summary odds ratio (OR) of 1.13 (95% CI 1.09 -1.18) for each SD increase after adjustment for conventional cardiovascular risk factors. The corresponding adjusted risk ratio for ischemic stroke was 1.10 (95% CI 1.02-1.18).In this issue of Clinical Chemistry, Mora et al. (4 ) report prospective data from healthy US women [Women's Health Study (WHS)] on Lp(a) concentration and risk of type 2 diabetes and replicate their findings in a cohort of Danish men and women [Copenhagen City Heart Study (CCHS)] with prevalent diabetes. In WHS participants, incident type 2 diabetes was ascertained primarily by self-report on annual follow-up questionnaires but was extensively validated by supplemental questionnaires and review of medical records. In the CCHS, prevalent type 2 diabetes was ascertained by self-report, the use of hypoglycemic drugs, or a nonfasting plasma glucose Ͼ200 mg/dL. Surprisingly, Lp(a) concentrations in the WHS and CCHS were significantly lower in diabetes cases compared with noncases, although the medians differed clearly by study population (WHS 9.5 vs 10.7 mg/dL, P Ͻ 0.001; CCHS 15.7 vs 17.4 mg/dL, P ϭ 0.006). Pearson correlation coefficients showed a low correlation of Lp(a) with other risk factors for diabetes in the WHS (all coefficients Ͻ0.02). In the WHS, the incidence rates for diabetes were significantly lower in quintiles 2-5 compared with quintile 1. In fasting participants, there was a threshold effect of approximately 20% lower relative risk in quintiles 2-5 compared with quintile 1. In nonfasting participants, there was a more linear effect, with an up to 50% lower relative risk in quintile 5 compared with quintile 1. Notably, the inverse association of Lp(a) with diabetes remained significant and was only minimally attenuated after full adjustment for covariates, including LDL cholesterol, triglycerides, and HbA1c. Overall, nonfasting low Lp(a) concentrations were more strongly associated with risk of incident diabetes (P for interaction 0.002) compared with fasting concentrations. Almost identical results were obtained when participants were stratified by LDL cholesterol (below or above the median of 121 mg/dL) or when initially excluded women with baseline HbA1c Ն6.0% were included into analysis. These findings were replicated...