2018
DOI: 10.1007/s10479-018-3107-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A polyhedral study of dynamic monopolies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, the integer linear programming formulation of the problem has been studied by prior work, cf. [1,40,14].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, the integer linear programming formulation of the problem has been studied by prior work, cf. [1,40,14].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Convexity. Activation problems appear in the literature under a number of different names, such as r-neighbor bootstrap percolation [2-6, 18, 42, 51, 54], dynamic monopolies [15,19,46,55,58], irreversible conversion [17,43,47,56], or graph convexities, and were studied by researchers of various fields. As mentioned in the introduction, in the particular case in which all thresholds are equal to 2, generalized TSS model is also called 2-neighbor bootstrap percolation or P 3 -convexity, which is studied in the field of graph convexities.…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The minimum subset of nodes required under dynamic activation is also referred to as the dynamic monopoly, where nodes become activated if at least half of the neighbors are activated in the previous time period. Hence, an extra index of time is incorporated into the integer programming formulation to describe step-by-step activation of nodes, see [14,15,16]. We do not consider time dynamics in our problem despite the fact that the influence propagation occurs in discrete steps.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%