Context
Guidelines recommend blood-based fibrosis biomarkers to identify advanced nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), which is particularly prevalent in patients with obesity.
Objective
To study whether the degree of obesity affects the performance of liver fibrosis biomarkers in NAFLD.
Design
Cross-sectional cohort study comparing simple fibrosis scores (FIB-4, NFS, APRI, BARD, HFS) and newer scores incorporating neo-epitope biomarkers PRO-C3 (ADAPT, FIBC3) or CK-18 (MACK-3).
Setting
Tertiary referral center.
Patients
We recruited overweight/obese patients from endocrinology (n=307) and hepatology (n=71) clinics undergoing a liver biopsy (median BMI 40.3 [IQR 36.0–44.7] kg/m 2). Additionally, we studied 859 less obese patients with biopsy-proven NAFLD to derive BMI-adjusted cut-offs for NFS.
Main Outcome Measures
Biomarker AUROC, sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values to identify histological stage ≥F3 fibrosis or nonalcoholic steatohepatitis with ≥F2 fibrosis (fibrotic NASH).
Results
The scores with an AUROC >0.85 to identify ≥F3 fibrosis were ADAPT, FIB-4, FIBC3, and HFS. For fibrotic NASH, the best predictors were MACK-3 and ADAPT. The specificities of NFS, BARD, and FIBC3 deteriorated as a function of BMI. We derived and validated new cut-offs for NFS to rule in/out ≥F3 fibrosis in groups with BMIs <30.0, 30.0–39.9, and ≥40.0 kg/m 2. This optimized its performance at all levels of BMI. Sequentially combining FIB-4 with ADAPT or FIBC3 increased specificity to diagnose ≥F3 fibrosis.
Conclusions
In obese patients, the best-performing fibrosis biomarkers are ADAPT and the inexpensive FIB-4, which are unaffected by BMI. The widely used NFS loses specificity in obese individuals, which may be corrected with BMI-adjusted cut-offs.