1999
DOI: 10.1006/jmbi.1998.2417
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A polyadenylylation-specific RNA-contact site on the surface of the bifunctional vaccinia virus RNA modifying protein VP39 that is distinct from the mRNA 5′ end-binding “cleft” 1 1Edited by K. Nagai

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
30
0
2

Year Published

1999
1999
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
3
30
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast to VP55, the VP39 subunit has provided high-resolution crystal structures in combination with its methyltransferase cofactor (8), cofactor-product plus methyltransferase substrate RNA fragment (9) and cofactor-product plus intact methyltransferase substrate RNA (10). VP39 appears to possess multiple RNA binding sites (10)(11)(12). Consistent with this, VP39's two RNA end-modifying functions apparently utilize distinct regions of the protein surface (11,12).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to VP55, the VP39 subunit has provided high-resolution crystal structures in combination with its methyltransferase cofactor (8), cofactor-product plus methyltransferase substrate RNA fragment (9) and cofactor-product plus intact methyltransferase substrate RNA (10). VP39 appears to possess multiple RNA binding sites (10)(11)(12). Consistent with this, VP39's two RNA end-modifying functions apparently utilize distinct regions of the protein surface (11,12).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…VP55 acquires processivity by binding VP39 at a dimerization surface region distal to the VP39 methyltransferase cleft [61]. Conformational changes from this interaction occur in the VP39 methyltransferase, and VP55-VP39 interaction has been shown to positionally alter the VP55 RNA contact site [62]. …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite similarities in the N-terminal domain, the VP55 monomer and the VP55-VP39 heterodimer differ profoundly in their primer-binding properties. Notably, the optimal distance between the proximal U and distal UU of the primer is 10 nt greater in the heterodimer than in the VP55 monomer Deng et al, 1999). Since the maximum 'rocking' distance in VP55 is 6.5 Å (above), a distance that is inadequate to absorb 10 nt of additional ssNA, a more likely mechanism for absorption of the longer primer would seem to be primer re-routing in the heterodimer.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 97%