2009
DOI: 10.1088/0960-1317/19/11/115005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A poly(dimethylsiloxane) viscometer for microliter power law fluids

Abstract: This paper describes a poly(dimethylsiloxane) (PDMS) microfluidic device for measuring the viscosity of power law fluids. The viscometer utilized the high solubility and permeability of air in PDMS to generate vacuum and drive the Poiseuille flow in the degassed PDMS microchannels. Wide ranges of shear rates in PDMS microchannels were generated by controlling the chamber sizes of the PDMS viscometer. By measuring the distance the fluids traveled and the flow velocity in the PDMS microchannel, the flow behavior… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(40 reference statements)
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…glycerin, blood plasma and ethanol) 53 and non-Newtonian fluids (i.e. PEO and blood), 54 the PDMS-based viscometer measured the fluid viscosity more consistently than conventional viscometers.…”
mentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…glycerin, blood plasma and ethanol) 53 and non-Newtonian fluids (i.e. PEO and blood), 54 the PDMS-based viscometer measured the fluid viscosity more consistently than conventional viscometers.…”
mentioning
confidence: 89%
“…51 Furthermore, the viscosity of a test fluid was automatically measured by monitoring the advancing meniscus in the channel through the use of three droplet sensing techniques, namely, a digital electrode, an analogue electrode and a thermal electrode. 52 To replace expensive silicon-glass devices, Zheng et al 53,54 introduced a PDMS viscometer for monitoring the advancing meniscus of a test liquid in a capillary channel. The wettability of the fluid on the PDMS surface did not affect the viscosity measurement because the capillary forces were cancelled out in the data analysis.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To measure blood viscosity in a microfluidic device, blood is made to flow at a specific flow rate or velocity using several driving sources, such as syringe pumps, pressure sources [ 28 ], surface tension [ 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 ], and pipettes [ 33 ]. After that, as shown in Table 1 , several measurement techniques, including co-flowing streams [ 34 ], modified parallel flows [ 9 , 24 ], microflow compartments [ 35 , 36 ], reversal flow-switching [ 10 , 37 , 38 , 39 ], advancing meniscus [ 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 ], and electric impedance measurements [ 40 , 41 ], can be used to measure blood viscosity. Considering some critical issues, such as RBC clogging and precise flow-rate control and calibration, the modified parallel flows method (MPFM) [ 9 , 24 ] shows high potential for continuous measurement of blood viscosity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the microfluidic platform, several viscosity measurement methods such as extensional flow, 16 capacity sensor, 17 capillary force, 18,19 comparator, 20,21 quartz crystal microbalance (QCM), 22 laser-induced capillary wave, 23 and multiple microfluidic channels 24 have been recently proposed. Most of these methods were focused on pure liquids rather than blood including cellular components.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Few of these methods have been applied to measure blood viscosity, only as a stand-alone approach. 19,24,25 Given that blood flow rate is not specified in a microvascular network, blood viscosities were routinely measured for wide ranges of shear rates, with the assumption that blood behaves as a nonNewtonian fluid. Thus, blood viscosity identification should be conducted at a specified flow rate, where blood circulates in a complex fluidic network.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%