A “politically robust” experimental design for public policy evaluation, with application to the Mexican Universal Health Insurance program

Abstract

We develop an approach to conducting large-scale randomized public policy experiments intended to be more robust to the political interventions that have ruined some or all parts of many similar previous efforts. Our proposed design is insulated from selection bias in some circumstances even if we lose observations; our inferences can still be unbiased even if politics disrupts any two of the three steps in our analytical procedures; and other empirical checks are available to validate the overall design. We illustrate with a design and empirical validation of an evaluation of the Mexican Seguro Popular de Salud (Universal Health Insurance) program we are conducting. Seguro Popular, which is intended to grow to provide medical care, drugs, preventative services, and financial health protection to the 50 million Mexicans without health insurance, is one of the largest health reforms of any country in the last two decades. The evaluation is also large scale, constituting one of the largest policy experiments to date and what may be the largest randomized health policy experiment ever. © 2007 by the Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management

Social security health insurance for the informal sector in Nicaragua: a randomized evaluation

“…This participation represented just 18.5% of 2 Perhaps the most similar study to this one is a recent evaluation by King et al (2009), where the authors evaluated a health insurance program in Mexico that randomized encouragement to sign up for insurance across health facilities. Similar to our study, they measured the shorter term effects (after 10 months) and found a reduction in health expenditures; there were no effects on health outcomes or overall utilization (King et al, 2007(King et al, , 2009. Another study similar to ours evaluated the expansion of government health insurance to the informal sector in Mexico in 2002 (Barros, 2009).…”

Does Expanding Health Insurance Beyond Formal-Sector Workers Encourage Informality?: Measuring the Impact of Mexico's Seguro Popular

“…King et al (2007) However, the program did not show some other expected health effects, possibly due to the short duration of treatment (10 months).…”

Public policy for the poor? A randomised assessment of the Mexican universal health insurance programme

“…Here, we present an experimental assessment of these health reforms. We introduce aspects of a so called stepped wedge experimental design, 8,9 which uses the phased rollout of the national programme to make randomisation politically feasible and ethical. We also discuss expectations, including the idea that Seguro Popular funds would reach the poor and increase health-care utilisation.…”