2020
DOI: 10.1080/09589236.2020.1768363
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A policy paradox: why gender equity is men’s work

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Reviewing existing migration policies and procedures, and the effect on women’s status may improve health outcomes for women [ 48 ]. In the interim, other studies have posited the need for further work with men, to achieve gender and sexual health equity [ 49 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reviewing existing migration policies and procedures, and the effect on women’s status may improve health outcomes for women [ 48 ]. In the interim, other studies have posited the need for further work with men, to achieve gender and sexual health equity [ 49 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Along with a personal commitment to fairness, this predicts helpful allyship among members of the privileged in-group (Prime and Moss-Racusin 2009). Second, men who are successful allies for gender equity also must develop an understanding of the gender biases that drive inequities lest their good-faith advocacy unintentionally affirms these stereotypes (Anicha, Bilen-Green, and Green 2020).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The research on the impact of faculty/student relationships, coupled with the literature on the positive effects of dominant group advocacy efforts [32] - [37], suggests that allyship may be regarded as a potential opportunity to affect women's representation in STEM [38], [6], [39], [7]. However, many men fail to even recognize the problem of gender inequity in STEM, and in denying the existence of the challenges women in STEM are forced to navigate, men reify existing gender disparities [40] For example, in their study of over 700 participants in which 30% of respondents were faculty, Handley et al [40] found that men were less receptive to scholarship that examines gender bias in STEM than their women peers.…”
Section: Men Allies In Stemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although allies may not be able to affect the beliefs of all men, they may be able to influence some colleagues -both women and men. In the case of supporting women, the efforts of a man ally may support a woman's retention in a STEM discipline [5], [38], [6], [39], [7]. However, research suggests that without an increased willingness by those in the majority in STEM to concede that gender bias and discrimination are real obstacles for women in these disciplines, creating cultural change may prove to be difficult [40].…”
Section: Men Allies In Stemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation