Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM 2008 Conference on Data Communication 2008
DOI: 10.1145/1402958.1402966
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A policy-aware switching layer for data centers

Abstract: Today's data centers deploy a variety of middleboxes (e.g., firewalls, load balancers and SSL offloaders) to protect, manage and improve the performance of the applications and services they run. Unfortunately, existing networks provide limited support for middleboxes. Administrators typically overload layer-2 path selection mechanisms to make sure that traffic traverses the desired sequence of middleboxes. These ad-hoc practices result in a data center network that is hard to configure, upgrade and maintain, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
75
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 129 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
75
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, multi-path routing [6] [8] [12] [13] has been exploited for load balancing in data center networks. Other complementary research for data center networking has focused on TCP incast problem [14], traffic-aware virtual machine migration [15], switch design [16] [17] or cost efficiency [2] [3], etc.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, multi-path routing [6] [8] [12] [13] has been exploited for load balancing in data center networks. Other complementary research for data center networking has focused on TCP incast problem [14], traffic-aware virtual machine migration [15], switch design [16] [17] or cost efficiency [2] [3], etc.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Middlebox policies can be supported in an ad-hoc fashion in both networks. There are two ways we can do this-Tunneling [15] packets from one middlebox to another or by installing policy rules on all switches [16]. The latter approach is not scalable, since it consumes a lot of space on switch TCAMs, which are limited in size.…”
Section: Architecturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Separate Policy from Reachability: We borrow this principle from [16]. Ad-hoc practices for ensuring middlebox traversal, like removing links to create choke points, are hard to configure and maintain.…”
Section: Middlebox Supportmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Dilip et al [24] proposed PLayer and pswitch: a policyaware switching layer architecture consisting of interconnected policy-aware switches. In accordance with policies specified by administrators, pswitches explicitly forward different types of traffic through different sequence middleboxes (e.g., Firewalls and Load Balancers).…”
Section: Middle-boxes/appliancesmentioning
confidence: 99%