2018
DOI: 10.1109/jphot.2018.2809792
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Polarization-Based Interference-Tolerant VLC Link for Low Data Rate Applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [80], at the receiver two PDs with different polarization filters are used to cancel interference. A similar method was proposed in [81] to resist unpolarized optical interference. These approaches do not require extra feedback to exchange CSI.…”
Section: ) Specially Tailoredmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In [80], at the receiver two PDs with different polarization filters are used to cancel interference. A similar method was proposed in [81] to resist unpolarized optical interference. These approaches do not require extra feedback to exchange CSI.…”
Section: ) Specially Tailoredmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Precoding [126][127][128][129] BIA [135][136][137] Polarization [143], [144] ADR [54], [141], [142] SIC [139], [140] Interference Avoidance…”
Section: Orthogonal Divisionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Related work demonstrated a setup consisting of red/green/blue laser diodes reaching 40 Gbit/s using PDM OFDM signals [ 15 ]. Furthermore, other research has used orthogonal polarizers at both the transmitter and the receiver side to implement differential signalling between polarization states on one hand and to increase robustness to interference on the other hand [ 16 ]. These systems deploy photodiode receivers, which increase the bandwidth significantly compared to camera-based receivers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These systems deploy photodiode receivers, which increase the bandwidth significantly compared to camera-based receivers. While the receiver orientation was fixed in aforementioned work [ 16 ], the impact of the receiver rotation with respect to the transmitters was assessed in previous work [ 17 ]. In this work, this assessment is reiterated and extended.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%