2015
DOI: 10.1007/s11205-015-0919-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Poisson-Based Framework for Setting Poverty Thresholds Using Indicator Lists

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite its advantages, such as its statistical comparability to measure income poverty across time and countries, the arop60 indicator might be problematic for the purpose of assessing income adequacy. First, there is no evidence on the extent to which an income at the level of the arop60 enables to live a life in human dignity nor if it represents the same living standard across time and countries (Goedemé et al 2019;Fahey 2007;Babones et al 2016). A study of Goedemé et al (2019) has shown that the arop60 approaches an adequate living standard in most richer member states, while the level is far from a decent income in poorer member states.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite its advantages, such as its statistical comparability to measure income poverty across time and countries, the arop60 indicator might be problematic for the purpose of assessing income adequacy. First, there is no evidence on the extent to which an income at the level of the arop60 enables to live a life in human dignity nor if it represents the same living standard across time and countries (Goedemé et al 2019;Fahey 2007;Babones et al 2016). A study of Goedemé et al (2019) has shown that the arop60 approaches an adequate living standard in most richer member states, while the level is far from a decent income in poorer member states.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We do so because, as Babones, Moussa and Suter (2016) observed in a rather influential article, the poverty thresholds or the poverty lines that are customarily used to assess how many people in a country live above or below such line have little to no conceptual basis and are rather inappropriate to assess poverty as 'relative deprivation' which is what Kinyondo and Pelizzo (2018) detected in the Tanzanian case. Hence, to avoid the methodological problems and shortcoming that Babones, Moussa and Suter (2016) denounced in their study, we decided to rely on lived poverty which is measured on the basis of whether and how often respondents go, in the course of one year, without food, water, medical care, cooking fuel and cash income. By using the data collected by Afrobarometer in Tanzania, we are able to create one set of indicators that capture the extension of lived poverty, that is what percentage of the respondents, experiences deprivation, but we also develop a series of indicators that capture the severity of lived poverty, that is how frequently respondents experience this problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatively, one could argue that the lack of three items might be too high of a threshold to correctly identify vulnerabilities (Babones et al, 2015). Since this is not a homogeneous result among all years and groups, we leave this discussion for further research and we acknowledge that there are more people at risk of poverty than of material deprivation given our choice of indicators.…”
Section: Descriptive Statisticsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Moreover, this approach allows adjusting for the socio-economic context and thus the threshold to vary, which would be more accurate as not every country is similar in terms of socio-economic and structural contexts (Babones et al 2015).…”
Section: Povertymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation