2010
DOI: 10.1145/1805724.1805725
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A plea for modesty

Abstract: From time to time a movement arises that promises to save the world, or at least to make it vastly better. The extraordinary achievements of digital computing make it a locus of such movements today. Yet we should be wary; when movements fail they provoke backlash that rejects the more limited gains that they might have afforded. Today "computational thinking" has a considerable following, and I would like to discuss some problems with its discourse. It is too often presented in terms that could be interpreted… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
45
0
14

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
45
0
14
Order By: Relevance
“…Our work, however, focuses on what all teachers need to know and be able to do in order to use CT as a means for exploring disciplinary content (e.g., mathematics, science, and literacy). Embedding CT knowledge and skills across the curriculum is essential for helping students understand how to use computing tools to represent knowledge, solve problems, create and discover new questions within specific disciplines (Hemmendinger, 2010). Additionally, the approach of embedding CT across curricula is consistent with current CT frameworks (e.g., CSTA/ISTE) and with the roles of elementary school teachers as generalists (i.e., teaching all subject areas).…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our work, however, focuses on what all teachers need to know and be able to do in order to use CT as a means for exploring disciplinary content (e.g., mathematics, science, and literacy). Embedding CT knowledge and skills across the curriculum is essential for helping students understand how to use computing tools to represent knowledge, solve problems, create and discover new questions within specific disciplines (Hemmendinger, 2010). Additionally, the approach of embedding CT across curricula is consistent with current CT frameworks (e.g., CSTA/ISTE) and with the roles of elementary school teachers as generalists (i.e., teaching all subject areas).…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Computational thinking is not entirely embraced by all; critics suggest that the term is narrowing (Denning, 2009) or that computational thinking processes are widespread in other sciences (Hemmendinger, 2010). Indeed, definitions of computational thinking tend to be by example (Lee et al, 2011).…”
Section: Computational Thinkingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequent research has expanded and interpreted the term further (Lu et al, 2009, Grover & Pea, 2013, Selby & Woollard, 2013). Computational thinking is not entirely embraced by all; critics suggest that the term is narrowing (Denning, 2009) or that computational thinking processes are widespread in other sciences (Hemmendinger, 2010). Among other contributions coming from educators, Lee et al (2011) suggest that we should start from practical examples of what we mean by computational thinking, and identify the terms "abstraction", "automation", and "analysis" as being particularly useful to understand how young pupils can deal with novel problems.…”
Section: Computational Thinkingmentioning
confidence: 99%