2011
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-10595-1_4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Platform for Spatial Data Labeling in an Urban Context

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to analyze the interactions between climate and urban shape, the territory is partitioned into elementary areas: the « city blocks » (Lesbegueries et al 2009). This partitioning is generic and automatic: morphologically homogeneous city blocks are defined from the road network as illustrated in Figure 2 to respect the spatial organization of the city and the building configurations.…”
Section: Elementary Spatial Unit: the City Blockmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to analyze the interactions between climate and urban shape, the territory is partitioned into elementary areas: the « city blocks » (Lesbegueries et al 2009). This partitioning is generic and automatic: morphologically homogeneous city blocks are defined from the road network as illustrated in Figure 2 to respect the spatial organization of the city and the building configurations.…”
Section: Elementary Spatial Unit: the City Blockmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method to create these historical databases has been presented in (Perret et al 2009). During the project we created historical databases at different dates on different areas.…”
Section: Experimental Results and Commentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, some additional errors may be caused by the false topological relations of the objects that appear during the generalization. And some problems arising while overlapping and labeling objects should be mentioned as well [11]. Some uncertainness still to mention: shadows from the buildings, directions of roofs, etc.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%