2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2020.02.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A platform for context-specific genetic engineering of recombinant protein production by CHO cells

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Greater enhancement was observed with CHO cells where mild hypothermia resulted in an 8.5-fold higher qP than that at 37°C, and a further increase in titer (10.9-fold, 5.4 mg/L) was obtained via increased cell accumulation. We anticipate that improved CHO systems (e.g., ExpiCHO-S cell line and ExpiCHO medium) as well as coexpression of genetic effectors and chemical chaperone addition (Cartwright et al, 2020;Johari et al, 2015) would significantly increase spike transient production in CHO cells. The CHO-derived spike exhibited a monomeric molecular mass of ~200 kDa by SDS-PAGE (Figure 1D) and a trimeric mass of ~670 kDa was measured using analytical size exclusion chromatography (Supplementary Figure S2).…”
Section: Accepted Articlementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Greater enhancement was observed with CHO cells where mild hypothermia resulted in an 8.5-fold higher qP than that at 37°C, and a further increase in titer (10.9-fold, 5.4 mg/L) was obtained via increased cell accumulation. We anticipate that improved CHO systems (e.g., ExpiCHO-S cell line and ExpiCHO medium) as well as coexpression of genetic effectors and chemical chaperone addition (Cartwright et al, 2020;Johari et al, 2015) would significantly increase spike transient production in CHO cells. The CHO-derived spike exhibited a monomeric molecular mass of ~200 kDa by SDS-PAGE (Figure 1D) and a trimeric mass of ~670 kDa was measured using analytical size exclusion chromatography (Supplementary Figure S2).…”
Section: Accepted Articlementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, simply speeding up cell line development by new and more efficient selection mechanisms or by the above mentioned use of targeted integration and of pre-optimised cell lines, will reduce the number of divisions that a cell line will undergo until ready for manufacturing, thus also reducing the accumulation of variants or mutations. Finally, in all these approaches the impact of the product gene and its specific requirements for translation, processing and secretion will have to be taken into account [215,234]. Steps towards creating a Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) chassis cell line.…”
Section: What Is Missing Towards the Construction Of A Cho Chassis Cell?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Greater enhancement was observed with CHO cells where mild hypothermia resulted in an 8.5-fold higher qP than that at 37°C, and a further increase in titer (10.9-fold, 5.4 mg/L) was obtained via increased cell accumulation. We anticipate that improved CHO systems (e.g., ExpiCHO-S cell line and ExpiCHO medium) as well as co-expression of genetic effectors and chemical chaperone addition (Cartwright et al, 2020;Johari et al, 2015) would significantly increase spike transient production in CHO cells.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Greater enhancement was observed with CHO cells where mild hypothermia resulted in an 8.5‐fold higher qP than that at 37°C, and a further increase in titer (10.9‐fold, 5.4 mg/L) was obtained via increased cell accumulation. We anticipate that improved CHO systems (e.g., ExpiCHO‐S cell line and ExpiCHO medium) as well as co‐expression of genetic effectors and chemical chaperone addition (Cartwright et al, 2020; Johari et al, 2015) would significantly increase spike transient production in CHO cells. The CHO‐derived spike exhibited a monomeric molecular mass of ~200 kDa by sodium dodecyl sulfate‐polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS‐PAGE) (Figure 1d) and a trimeric mass of ~670 kDa was measured using analytical size exclusion chromatography (Figure S2).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%