2020
DOI: 10.1038/s41586-020-2185-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A plant genetic network for preventing dysbiosis in the phyllosphere

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
274
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 326 publications
(286 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
11
274
1
Order By: Relevance
“…2, 8). This result is similar to recent studies indicating that dysbiosis of endophytic microbiome in the phyllosphere caused the leaves to exhibit non-pathogenic symptoms of the disease [28], suggesting that the structure of the endophytic microbiome could play a key role in maintaining plant health. However, how diseases mediated by pathogenic invasions are related to dysbiosis of the endophytic microbiome remains to be further studied.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…2, 8). This result is similar to recent studies indicating that dysbiosis of endophytic microbiome in the phyllosphere caused the leaves to exhibit non-pathogenic symptoms of the disease [28], suggesting that the structure of the endophytic microbiome could play a key role in maintaining plant health. However, how diseases mediated by pathogenic invasions are related to dysbiosis of the endophytic microbiome remains to be further studied.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Plant adapt to drought by manipulating aboveground-belowground feedbacks between plants and soil microbiota [19]. The aboveground tissue is functionally distinct from the belowground tissue [47]. Plant tness responses to drought were governed by rapid changes in belowground microbial communities [19].…”
Section: Microbiota Communities Resident In Above-and Belowground Tismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To design PCR primers that speci cally amplify the bacterial 16S, sequence alignment was performed using plant Mt18S and Ct16S and bacterial 16S. Because plant bacterial microbiota is mainly composed of Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria, Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes [19,29,39,40], we selected 33 species from these four phyla ( Fig. S1A) and aligned the corresponding 16S with Mt18S and Ct16S of several plants, including O. sativa, A. thaliana, and Zea mays.…”
Section: Primer Design and In Silico Evaluation Of Primer Coveragementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this non-culture method is still not suitable for analyses of the plant endo-bacteriome because of the high sequence identity among bacterial 16S, plant Mt18S and Ct16S sequences. In a few previous studies, bacterial cells have been enriched from plant tissues by washing and vortexing [16,17] or the host DNA has been ltered out from the sequencing results [12,[18][19][20][21]. However, the former approach inevitably leads to an incomplete collection of endophytes, and the latter results in limited sequencing depth and low coverage of bacterial communities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation