A Planning Model for Improving Personnel Competence in Pursuit of Sustainable Development

Abstract

The primary objective of this article is to explore ways to improve personnel competence in the context of sustainable development. To achieve this, our key scientific task is to develop a planning model for enhancing personnel competence within the context of sustainable development for a selected organization. The organization's personnel is the subject of this study. Our research was motivated by the objective of discovering ways to enhance personnel competence for socio-economic systems like an organization, all within the context of sustainable development. As a result, we have developed a contemporary three-level planning model for improving personnel competence in the context of sustainable development. Each level of the model is presented in detail and characterized accordingly. We used the IDEF technique as our primary modeling method, and the planning model was developed using vector programs. The key elements of the planning model include graphic visualization, context characterization, and information accessibility. The novelty of our research results lies in the formation of a modern methodological perspective on increasing personnel competence in the context of sustainable development. However, this article has a limitation: the study was conducted solely in the context of improving the planning process. Consequently, we only characterized one stage-planning. Our future research will be directed toward studying all stages of improving personnel competence in the context of sustainable development.

Methodical Approach to the Choice of a Business Management Strategy Within the Framework of a Change in Commercial Activities

“…The strategic model describes the structure very well and is always convenient for developing standards for the commercial activities of the enterprise. In general, IDEF is a popular technique, but most studies (Zhovnirchyk et al, 2023;Zakharchyn et al, 2023;Kopytko et al, 2023) are presented through IDEF0 rather than IDEF3. Considering the results of comparing the IDEF0 and IDEF3 methods, we can conclude that the process model is suitable for reflecting responsibility for the actions performed, therefore, IDEF3 can only be used at the top level, when the order of process execution is determined, and the order of their interaction within the framework of building strategies.…”