2009
DOI: 10.1017/s1092852900020046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Placebo-Controlled Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Flexible-Dose Desvenlafaxine Treatment in Outpatients with Major Depressive Disorder

Abstract: Introduction: This research compares the efficacy and safety of desvenlafaxine (administered as desvenlafaxine succinate) versus placebo in treating major depressive disorder.Methods: In this randomized, double-blind study, outpatients with major depressive disorder ≥18 years of age received desvenlafaxine 200–400 mg/day or placebo for 8 weeks. Efficacy endpoints included (primary) change in 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression score at the final evaluation (last observation carried forward, analysis o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Outpatients who met diagnostic criteria for MDD and presented with HAM-D 17 total scores of greater than or equal to 20 at study entry were enrolled in the 10 placebo-controlled, short-term, desvenlafaxine clinical trials (conducted in the USA and at various international sites) that were included in these analyses (DeMartinis et al, 2007;Liebowitz et al, 2007;Septien-Velez et al, 2007;Boyer et al, 2008;Lieberman et al, 2008;Liebowitz et al, 2008;Feiger et al, 2009;Tourian et al, 2009;Kornstein et al, 2010). For all analyses, the individual desvenlafaxine dose groups (intent-to-treat population) were pooled.…”
Section: Patientsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Outpatients who met diagnostic criteria for MDD and presented with HAM-D 17 total scores of greater than or equal to 20 at study entry were enrolled in the 10 placebo-controlled, short-term, desvenlafaxine clinical trials (conducted in the USA and at various international sites) that were included in these analyses (DeMartinis et al, 2007;Liebowitz et al, 2007;Septien-Velez et al, 2007;Boyer et al, 2008;Lieberman et al, 2008;Liebowitz et al, 2008;Feiger et al, 2009;Tourian et al, 2009;Kornstein et al, 2010). For all analyses, the individual desvenlafaxine dose groups (intent-to-treat population) were pooled.…”
Section: Patientsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The experiment was performed in four randomized sessions on separate days: control session (1 placebo tablet given orally, 6 h before the study), DVS session (50 mg DVS given orally, 6 h before the study), propranolol session (1 mg·kg Ϫ1 ·h Ϫ1 iv, immediately before the study), and propranolol ϩ DVS session (50 mg DVS given orally, 6 h before the study and 1 mg·kg Ϫ1 ·h Ϫ1 iv propranolol, immediately before the study). The dose of 50 mg for DVS was based on a previous study (16). We chose to give DVS 6 h before the study (or about 7 h before the actual recordings) because the maximum plasma concentration of DVS was reported to be 7 to 8 h after oral administration (35).…”
Section: Experimental Protocolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[31][32][33][34][35][36] Several published abstracts were also reviewed: including a fl exible dose trial of DVS 200 to 400 mg, 37 a trial comparing DVS 50 and 100 mg to placebo with a duloxetine reference arm, 8 as well as two unpublished pooled analyses, the fi rst involving 7 short-term trials with DVS doses between 100 and 400 mg 39 and the second from 2 trials with DVS at 50 and 100 mg. 40 Other studies of DVS as a treatment for vasomotor symptoms of menopause and pain were not reviewed. No published trials for generalized anxiety disorder or other anxiety disorders were located.…”
Section: Effi Cacy In Clinical Trialsmentioning
confidence: 99%