2016
DOI: 10.1080/2373566x.2016.1157031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Place for Other Stories: Authorship and Evidence in Experimental Times

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
16
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…As Rose explains, stories can be understood as the origins of our thinking. While they attempt to resonate with something, their purpose is to “affect, move, or incite” (, p. 135).…”
Section: (Un)knowing Mobile Householdsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As Rose explains, stories can be understood as the origins of our thinking. While they attempt to resonate with something, their purpose is to “affect, move, or incite” (, p. 135).…”
Section: (Un)knowing Mobile Householdsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…He explains that when social scientists present stories as a way of communicating empirical findings, they confuse matters because their purposes differ, the storyteller accommodating a greater 'distance between words and the world'. 76 But, as Rose also acknowledges, stories and empirics do sometimes converge, as, for example, when cultural and social researchers engage with storying as a means of gathering, distilling, interpreting and disseminating findings. Doing so, they may try to tell representative stories, perhaps by ensuring that all participants have equal airtime and trying to draw their voices together into some coherent form.…”
Section: Collaborative Content: Shared Storiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In asking participants for vignettes of their experiences, we sought a storied experience of the event. Like Stewart's understanding of writing as a creative opening, Rose (2016) suggests that the potential of stories lies in the origins they both acknowledge and inaugurate. Rose argues that the telling of stories in research should not be thought of as evidence -empirics used in the service of a grand theory -but as ethical acts which reveal the origins of thought,disclose the utter reliance of the researcher on their encounters with others and by acknowledging the shared origins of our work,thus recognise the distributed ownership of the thought that emerges.…”
Section: Storied Experiencementioning
confidence: 99%