2014
DOI: 10.1111/cura.12071
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Place for Kids? The Public Image of Natural History Museums

Abstract: Scholars, commentaries, guide books, and people “on the street” seem to agree and take for granted that natural history museums are mainly aimed at children. Nevertheless, no studies have specifically investigated the public image of natural history museums. In this study, we provide quantitative evidence that natural history museums are indeed seen by the public as being primarily aimed at children and families with children, and we discuss the consequences that this fact has for the potential role that natur… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A measure of opportunities for science learning out of the home environment was generated from questions asking the parent whether (1) since the beginning of the academic year, they attended a school event, such as a science fair, with their child; (2) whether in the past month, they visited a zoo, aquarium, or petting farm; (3) if they have visited a state or national park with their child; (4) whether their child attended a day or overnight camps; and (5) whether they visited an art gallery, museum, or historical site over the last summer. Although this last question asked about art or science museums, it was included as an opportunity for science learning given that children are noticeably more likely to go to science museums and natural history museums than to art museums (for a review, see Strager and Astrup 2014). The opportunities for learning variables were made by creating z-scores for parent responses on each item and predicting a factor based on regression scores.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A measure of opportunities for science learning out of the home environment was generated from questions asking the parent whether (1) since the beginning of the academic year, they attended a school event, such as a science fair, with their child; (2) whether in the past month, they visited a zoo, aquarium, or petting farm; (3) if they have visited a state or national park with their child; (4) whether their child attended a day or overnight camps; and (5) whether they visited an art gallery, museum, or historical site over the last summer. Although this last question asked about art or science museums, it was included as an opportunity for science learning given that children are noticeably more likely to go to science museums and natural history museums than to art museums (for a review, see Strager and Astrup 2014). The opportunities for learning variables were made by creating z-scores for parent responses on each item and predicting a factor based on regression scores.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Просвітницька діяльність природничих музеїв зазвичай сприймається як засіб впливу лише на дітей та юнацтво, а громадськість, журналісти та навіть дослідники часто сприймають природничі музеї як установи, орієнтовані на дітей, і в такому аспекті їхній публічний імідж радикально відрізняється від іміджу художніх музеїв (Strager & Astrup 2014;Chervonenko 2015). Важливою задачею природничих музеїв є змінити цей імідж дитячого розважального закладу, оскільки в такому разі вони ризикують втратити свій авторитет потужних наукових центрів, провідну роль в інтерпретації науки для дорослих і у їхньому залученні до обгово рення широкого кола наукових питань.…”
Section: наукова і просвітницька роль природничих музеївunclassified
“…Danish science researchers Hanne Strager and Jens Astrup (2014) study the public image of natural history museums and find that they are seen as aimed at children and families with children. Strager and Jens Astrup (2014) also discuss the challenges in visitor communication resulting from these associations.…”
Section: How To Study Museum Viewsmentioning
confidence: 99%