2020
DOI: 10.1109/tcsi.2020.2994812
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Pipelined Reduced Complexity Two-Stages Parallel LMS Structure for Adaptive Beamforming

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another double-stage LLMS variant [ 20 ] was formulated for concentric circular arrays. In order to address the concerns about complexity and to facilitate practical hardware implementation a Parallel LMS algorithm [ 21 ] was introduced. A scheme is still required that maintains a balance among convergence speed, mean square error (MSE), and computational cost.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another double-stage LLMS variant [ 20 ] was formulated for concentric circular arrays. In order to address the concerns about complexity and to facilitate practical hardware implementation a Parallel LMS algorithm [ 21 ] was introduced. A scheme is still required that maintains a balance among convergence speed, mean square error (MSE), and computational cost.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The unprecedented increase in wireless connected devices has tightened the constraints on popular adaptive algorithms, such as: Least Mean Square (LMS), Recursive Least Square (RLS) and various variants [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10], when targeting beamforming applications [11][12][13]. Such constraints are reflected by the requirement of an accelerated convergence rate, a high precision beam pointing accuracy and a reduced complexity structure suitable for a hardware implementation [14][15][16][17]. Recently, two multi-stage adaptive beamforming algorithms have been proposed to eliminate the tradeoff between the LMS convergence speed and its steady state error [18,19]: parallel LMS (pLMS) [18], and the parallel RLMS (RLMSp) [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to the pLMS with a linear computational complexity of order O(N ), where N represents the number of antenna elements, the RLMSp presents an undesirable quadratic complexity of order O(N 2 ) and requires the use of a division operation [17]. However simple and effective, the pLMS does not abide to the pre-set constraints, it doubles the resource requirements of the classical LMS and requires computing an independent set of weights, i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation