2016 International Conference on Emerging Technologies (ICET) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/icet.2016.7813212
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A pipeline inspection gauge based on low cost magnetic flux leakage sensing magnetometers for non-destructive testing of pipelines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other works involving MFL pipeline inspection can be found in [ 17 , 101 ]. In [ 101 ], a lightweight MFL inspection tool, using electromagnetic solenoids, was proposed for operation in small pipelines.…”
Section: Pipeline Failure Detection Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Other works involving MFL pipeline inspection can be found in [ 17 , 101 ]. In [ 101 ], a lightweight MFL inspection tool, using electromagnetic solenoids, was proposed for operation in small pipelines.…”
Section: Pipeline Failure Detection Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The permanent magnets of conventional MFL PIG produce a strong adhesive magnetic force that is not suitable for the inspection of smaller pipelines. In [ 17 ], a cost-effective MFL inspection method, using commercially available magnetometer, was designed and tested.…”
Section: Pipeline Failure Detection Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The deterioration of pipelines outside the buried environment is predominantly detected using magnetic flux leakage (MFL) [ 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 ]. Robot-assisted inspection is emerging as a viable alternative, offering operational cost savings and reducing the risk of human casualties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…marginal cost, long transportation distance, large volume per unit time and continuous supply [1][2][3]. However, with the extension of the service time of the pipeline, its metal properties will inevitably deteriorate or even be damaged [4,5], which will cause further corrosion or even leakage of the pipeline [6], bringing substantial economic losses and irreversible impact on the environment [7]. To ensure the pipeline's safe operation, routine inspections should be carried out every 3-5 years, and non-destructive testing should be carried out periodically.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%