2022
DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/rvzyc
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A pipeline for Solid Domestic Waste classification using Computer Vision

Abstract: This work aims to build and analyze a pipeline for solid domestic waste classification. The first steps that were carried out for this were to divide into three main lines that work together to achieve the pipeline. Each line used different sub-approaches to deep learning, relying on both the literature and the advisors, but without neglecting the binary classification work previously carried out. Additionally, a CRISP-DM methodology is taken into account to carry out the work without taking apart the mathemat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 11 publications
(12 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These findings demonstrate the effectiveness of using the CNN algorithm with Multilayer Hybrid feature extraction for waste classification through image processing. In 2021, Gomez et al [16] conducted a study on waste image processing, evaluating multiple methods to identify the most accurate and appropriate approach for waste classification. The findings suggest that the SVM method is more effective in accurately classifying waste than other methods evaluated in this research.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These findings demonstrate the effectiveness of using the CNN algorithm with Multilayer Hybrid feature extraction for waste classification through image processing. In 2021, Gomez et al [16] conducted a study on waste image processing, evaluating multiple methods to identify the most accurate and appropriate approach for waste classification. The findings suggest that the SVM method is more effective in accurately classifying waste than other methods evaluated in this research.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%