2017
DOI: 10.3233/wor-172611
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A pilot study to precisely quantify forces applied by sonographers while scanning: A step toward reducing ergonomic injury

Abstract: It is feasible to directly measure forces applied by sonographers using a high-resolution force measurement system. Forces applied during abdominal imaging vary widely, are significantly higher when scanning subjects with high BMI, and are not related to sonographer years of experience. This force measurement system has the potential to provide an additional quantitative data point to explore the impact of applied forces on sonographer related musculoskeletal injury, particularly in conjunction with various bo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using an instrumented transducer, measured mean and maximum applied axial forces exerted during abdominal scans of healthy volunteers were 7.9 and 17.4 N, respectively, for volunteers with BMI in the range of 18.5-25 (healthy weight category) and 10.5 and 23.5 N, respectively, for volunteers with BMI > 25. 8 Burnett and Campbell-Kyureghyan 9 published mean estimates of about 70 N of push force during lower extremity venous scans, by employing a force-matching technique. Based on electromyographic data, Village and Trask 10 estimated that mean forces during VT scans (lower extremity, renal) on actual patients ranged from 60 to 80 N.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using an instrumented transducer, measured mean and maximum applied axial forces exerted during abdominal scans of healthy volunteers were 7.9 and 17.4 N, respectively, for volunteers with BMI in the range of 18.5-25 (healthy weight category) and 10.5 and 23.5 N, respectively, for volunteers with BMI > 25. 8 Burnett and Campbell-Kyureghyan 9 published mean estimates of about 70 N of push force during lower extremity venous scans, by employing a force-matching technique. Based on electromyographic data, Village and Trask 10 estimated that mean forces during VT scans (lower extremity, renal) on actual patients ranged from 60 to 80 N.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If this study were carried out in a clinical department, it could also assess the effect on the matched grip force when scanning obese patients, which has been shown to impact on transducer grip force. 10,31 The dynamometer provides a consistent method of measuring grip pressure, although bias could be introduced as participants were aware that the researchers wanted to determine whether there was any effect from the training. There are also inherent challenges of using matched grip force, as found in the study by Boa et al 32 Many other factors influence a workers' chance of developing a WRMSD, 1,2,9,33 so further studies would benefit from addressing wider issues in addition to ergonomics and transducer grip.…”
Section: Limitations and Further Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If this study were carried out in a clinical department, it could also assess the effect on the matched grip force when scanning obese patients, which has been shown to impact on transducer grip force. 10,31…”
Section: Limitations and Further Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a more recent study proposed by Virga et al [30], the applied force is optimized based on the image quality and can increase up to 20 N for the abdominal aortic scan. Additionally, in the recent study proposed by Dhyani et al [31], although the mean value of the applied force was found to be 8.2 N, the maximum force during abdominal US examination varied widely, reaching 36.5 N. There is also evidence suggesting that the required level of force is related to the body mass index (BMI) of the patient.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%