2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.peh.2018.02.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A pilot study to explore the effects of substances on cognition, mood, performance, and experience of daily activities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our research suggests there is relatively high prevalence of use of licit, illicit, and prescribed substances that could have the potential to affect performance at work. However, in our research, there are few actual reports of substances having ever negatively impacted work performance as an immediate effect (Kiepek et al , 2018). The relationship between substance use and competent performance of professional roles remains an open question.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our research suggests there is relatively high prevalence of use of licit, illicit, and prescribed substances that could have the potential to affect performance at work. However, in our research, there are few actual reports of substances having ever negatively impacted work performance as an immediate effect (Kiepek et al , 2018). The relationship between substance use and competent performance of professional roles remains an open question.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…It would take a minimum of 8 min, plus an estimated additional 2 min per substance. The types of effects documents have been reported elsewhere (Kiepek et al , 2018), and were categorised as feeling (25 emotion-related changes), bodily changes (12 physiological-related changes), thinking (10 cognition-related changes) and doing/performance (21 changes related to engagement, performance or experience of activities). Relationships between substance use and mental health as indicated by the GAD-7 and the PHQ-9 are also reported elsewhere (submitted manuscript).…”
Section: Instrumentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is not to say that the health providers were unaware of potentially non-problematic or beneficial use or students were unaware of potential experiences of problematic use. One might assume that if health providers were talking about their own use of substances, the framing may include descriptions of rational choices and control (Kiepek & Beagan, 2018; Kiepek et al, 2018) and students frame stories of others to include the potential for substance use disorders. To elicit these nuanced understandings, probing questions may be refined to more explicitly elicit stories of self and stories of others.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Psychoactive substances have diverse effects and taking a second substance can amplify or build on the effect of the first, or it may diminish or counteract it, or the combination of the two substances may be experienced as a different effect. In everyday life, many people routinely alternate mundane stimulants like coffee, tea or tobacco and depressants like alcohol to change their mood and degree of alertness, often without conscious thought about doing so (Kiepek, Beagan & Harris, 2018).…”
Section: Alcohol and Use Of Other Psychoactive Substancesmentioning
confidence: 99%