2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104365
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A pilot study to compare virtual reality to hybrid simulation for opioid-related overdose and naloxone training

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
46
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
46
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on eleven studies that examined the effectiveness of virtual simulation in improving knowledge, five studies showed no significant differences between virtual simulation and their respective control groups. This means that virtual reality simulation was found equally effective compared to the traditional instructional method 9,11 , use of case studies 10 , hybrid simulation 12 , and face-to-face teaching 13 . On the other hand, six studies showed significant differences between virtual simulation and their respective control groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Based on eleven studies that examined the effectiveness of virtual simulation in improving knowledge, five studies showed no significant differences between virtual simulation and their respective control groups. This means that virtual reality simulation was found equally effective compared to the traditional instructional method 9,11 , use of case studies 10 , hybrid simulation 12 , and face-to-face teaching 13 . On the other hand, six studies showed significant differences between virtual simulation and their respective control groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Rossler, et al 11 also concluded that the use of virtual simulation has no statistically significant findings in knowledge for those using traditional programmatic teaching versus the addition of virtual reality simulation (VEST). Furthermore, Giordano, et al 12 found no difference in knowledge retention towards responding during an opioid-related overdose between students using virtual reality simulation to hybrid simulation. Cobbett, et al 13 also found no statistically significant difference in student knowledge between students taught face-to-face and those taught with virtual clinical simulations.…”
Section: Knowledgementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Second, the simulations developed usually involve either a single patient (Beaumont et al, 2014; Buttussi et al, 2013; Conradi et al, 2009; Cook et al, 2012; Creutzfeldt et al, 2010; Ferracani et al, 2015; Freeman et al, 2001; Giordano et al, 2020; Hemman, 2005; Schild et al, 2018) or mass casualty triage scenarios in which participants triage patients sequentially (Cicero et al, 2018; Cohen, Sevdalis, Taylor, et al, 2013; Cone et al, 2011; Farra et al, 2013; Greci et al, 2013; Ingrassia et al, 2015; Jain et al, 2016; Kizakevich et al, 2006; Knight et al, 2010; Mills et al, 2020). Scenarios rarely focus on situations where participants treat a few concurrent patients, which is not uncommon in practice (Kuisma et al, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Opioid Overdose Knowledge Scale (OOKS) was the first validated instrument of which we are aware to be used in conjunction with OEND (18) although other instruments have become available more recently (19). Consisting of 45 items in its original version, the OOKS continues to be frequently cited in studies that evaluate THN/OEND trainings (20-22). The OOKS has been translated into several languages for use in European countries and a short, 10-item form (i.e., the Brief Opioid Overdose Knowledge Scale [BOOK]) has been developed as well as a version adapted for use to assess knowledge specific to prescription opioids (23-25).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%