2008
DOI: 10.1080/09513590802444134
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A pilot study on the usefulness of body mass index and waist hip ratio as a predictive tool for gestational diabetes in Asian Indians

Abstract: Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is a common public health issue of pregnancy and women who have had GDM are at high risk for developing of diabetes mellitus Type-2. The aim of this study was to find the association between various clinical and biochemical parameters and GDM. One hundred and six consecutive patients who attended the out patient unit of department of gynecology, Kottayam Medical College, were enrolled in the study and followed up through the whole antenatal, intra-partum and post-partum peri… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
45
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
(14 reference statements)
0
45
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on the 1992-1995 National Health Interview Survey, the percentage of overweight women in Asian American subgroups ranged from 9% among Vietnamese and Chinese women to 25% among Asian Indian women, (Lauderdale and Rathouz, 2000) and Hawaiians and certain other Pacific Islander populations have even higher levels of overweight and obesity (Maskarinec et al, 2006). Second, a number of studies have reported that Asian Indians have particularly high waist-hip ratios (Davis, 2008;Madhavan et al, 2008) and higher body fat percentages at given BMI levels compared with Chinese and Malay Asians (Deurenberg-Yap et al, 2000); this could at least partially explain why Asian Indian women consistently have higher GDM rates than other API subgroups (Savitz et al, 2008;Berkowitz et al, 1992;Rao et al, 2006a). Finally, differences in other indices of body build such as short stature also have been suggested as possible contributors to differences in GDM risk (Anastasiou et al, 1998;Jang et al, 1998).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the 1992-1995 National Health Interview Survey, the percentage of overweight women in Asian American subgroups ranged from 9% among Vietnamese and Chinese women to 25% among Asian Indian women, (Lauderdale and Rathouz, 2000) and Hawaiians and certain other Pacific Islander populations have even higher levels of overweight and obesity (Maskarinec et al, 2006). Second, a number of studies have reported that Asian Indians have particularly high waist-hip ratios (Davis, 2008;Madhavan et al, 2008) and higher body fat percentages at given BMI levels compared with Chinese and Malay Asians (Deurenberg-Yap et al, 2000); this could at least partially explain why Asian Indian women consistently have higher GDM rates than other API subgroups (Savitz et al, 2008;Berkowitz et al, 1992;Rao et al, 2006a). Finally, differences in other indices of body build such as short stature also have been suggested as possible contributors to differences in GDM risk (Anastasiou et al, 1998;Jang et al, 1998).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, area under ROC curves were virtually the same (AUC ~0.6) by WC or BMI for discriminating women with GDM, leading the authors to conclude that both measures carry similar clinical information (Wendland et al 2007 ) . Lastly, a pilot study in India found an interaction between WHR and BMI, with WHR being a stronger risk factor among women who are heavier (Madhavan et al 2008 ) . From their analyses using ROC curves, BMI was found to be better than WHR or WC at predicting GDM case status (Madhavan et al 2008 ) .…”
Section: Evidence For Central Adiposity and Gdm Riskmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Lastly, a pilot study in India found an interaction between WHR and BMI, with WHR being a stronger risk factor among women who are heavier (Madhavan et al 2008 ) . From their analyses using ROC curves, BMI was found to be better than WHR or WC at predicting GDM case status (Madhavan et al 2008 ) . These fi ndings, however, were based on only eight GDM cases.…”
Section: Evidence For Central Adiposity and Gdm Riskmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…En cuanto a factores de riesgo antropomé-tricos, sólo se han descrito al IMC y la relación cintura cadera como predictores de DG [5][6][7] . Sin embargo, el índice de masa corporal (IMC) es un indicador que pierde valor en el embarazo al verse alterado por edema y por el mismo componente materno-fetal del embarazo.…”
Section: Universidad Católica Delunclassified