A pilot study on the effects of individually tailored education for MMR vaccine-hesitant parents on MMR vaccination intention

Gowda, Charitha; Schaffer, Sarah; Kopec, Kristin; Markel, Arielle; Dempsey, Amanda F.

doi:10.4161/hv.22821

Cited by 62 publications

(56 citation statements)

References 36 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…However, a study conducted in the US reported that parents conforming to the nationally recommended vaccination schedule were more likely to rank internet as the most important source in their networks as compared with non-conformer parents [34]. Current review related to childhood vaccination uptake using internet found similar findings [35][36][37][38].…”

Section: Internet-based Educational Interventionsupporting

confidence: 62%

A Systematic Review on Health Interventions Used in Enhancing Vaccination Uptake

Sutan¹,

Chew²,

Shuib³

et al. 2017

Clinics Mother Child Health

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Internet-based Educational Interventionsupporting

confidence: 62%

A Systematic Review on Health Interventions Used in Enhancing Vaccination Uptake

Sutan¹,

Chew²,

Shuib³

et al. 2017

Clinics Mother Child Health

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…and to properly evaluate the impact of the intervention [70]. The development of culturally adapted and personalised interventions has been shown to be effective in enhancing compliance with preventive behaviours, including vaccination [72][73][74].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Strategies intended to address vaccine hesitancy: Review of published reviews

Dubé

Gagnon

MacDonald

2015

Vaccine

488

377

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

When faced with vaccine hesitancy, public health authorities are looking for effective strategies to address this issue. In this paper, the findings of 15 published literature reviews or meta-analysis that have examined the effectiveness of different interventions to reduce vaccine hesitancy and/or to enhance vaccine acceptance are presented and discussed. From the literature, there is no strong evidence to recommend any specific intervention to address vaccine hesitancy/refusal. The reviewed studies included interventions with diverse content and approaches that were implemented in different settings and targeted various populations. Few interventions were directly targeted to vaccine hesitant individuals. Given the paucity of information on effective strategies to address vaccine hesitancy, when interventions are implemented, planning a rigorous evaluation of their impact on vaccine hesitancy/vaccine acceptance will be essential.

show abstract

“…One pilot study evaluated the impact of tailored messages to address specific concerns contributing to vaccine hesitancy. 28 Public health campaigns have adopted several communication approaches, including attempts to assuage concerns over risks of negative outcomes after vaccination. 29 However, a recent study in parents of children #17 years suggests that public health messaging concerning MMR vaccination, including pictorial and narrative communication, may actually decrease some parents' intentions to vaccinate their children.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Vaccine Message Framing and Parents’ Intent to Immunize Their Infants for MMR

et al. 2014

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Emphasizing societal benefits of vaccines has been linked to increased vaccination intentions in adults. It is unclear if this pattern holds for parents deciding whether to vaccinate their children. The objective was to determine whether emphasizing the benefits of measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccination directly to the vaccine recipient or to society differentially impacts parents' vaccine intentions for their infants. METHODS: In a national online survey, parents (N = 802) of infants <12 months old were randomly assigned to receive 1 of 4 MMR vaccine messages: (1) the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Vaccine Information Statement (VIS), (2) VIS and information emphasizing the MMR vaccine's benefits to the child, (3) VIS and information emphasizing societal benefits, or (4) VIS and information emphasizing benefits both to the child and society. Parents reported their likelihood of vaccinating their infants for MMR on a response scale of 0 (extremely unlikely) to 100 (extremely likely). RESULTS: Compared with the VIS-only group (mean intention = 86.3), parents reported increased vaccine intentions for their infants when receiving additional information emphasizing the MMR vaccine’s benefits either directly to the child (mean intention = 91.6, P = .01) or to both the child and society (mean intention = 90.8, P = .03). Emphasizing the MMR vaccine’s benefits only to society did not increase intentions (mean intention = 86.4, P = .97). CONCLUSIONS: We did not see increases in parents’ MMR vaccine intentions for their infants when societal benefits were emphasized without mention of benefits directly to the child. This finding suggests that providers should emphasize benefits directly to the child. Mentioning societal benefits seems to neither add value to, nor interfere with, information highlighting benefits directly to the child.

show abstract

A pilot study on the effects of individually tailored education for MMR vaccine-hesitant parents on MMR vaccination intention

Cited by 62 publications

References 36 publications

A Systematic Review on Health Interventions Used in Enhancing Vaccination Uptake

A Systematic Review on Health Interventions Used in Enhancing Vaccination Uptake

Strategies intended to address vaccine hesitancy: Review of published reviews

Vaccine Message Framing and Parents’ Intent to Immunize Their Infants for MMR

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About