2007
DOI: 10.1002/cncr.22495
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A pilot study of the vulnerable elders survey‐13 compared with the comprehensive geriatric assessment for identifying disability in older patients with prostate cancer who receive androgen ablation

Abstract: BACKGROUND.Impairments in geriatric domains adversely affect health outcomes of the elderly. The Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) is a key component of the treatment approach for older cancer patients, but it is time consuming. In this pilot study, the authors evaluated the validity of a brief, functionally based screening tool, the Vulnerable Elders Survey‐13 (VES‐13), for identifying older patients with prostate cancer (PCa) with impairment in the oncology clinic setting.METHODS.Patients with PCa age… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
156
1
7

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 241 publications
(181 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
7
156
1
7
Order By: Relevance
“…In response to this, screening instruments have been developed. The Vulnerable Elder Survey (VES-13) did correlate with a CGA in a pilot study of 50 patients with metastatic prostate cancer, as well as more diverse population of hematological and solid malignancies (21,22). The G8 instrument has been developed by the ONCODAGE project in France, and there are comparative data against the VES-13 suggests better sensitivity (23).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In response to this, screening instruments have been developed. The Vulnerable Elder Survey (VES-13) did correlate with a CGA in a pilot study of 50 patients with metastatic prostate cancer, as well as more diverse population of hematological and solid malignancies (21,22). The G8 instrument has been developed by the ONCODAGE project in France, and there are comparative data against the VES-13 suggests better sensitivity (23).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patients exhibiting deficiencies in one of the tests within each domain were defined as impaired in this domain. In accordance with previous research, patients exhibiting impairments in two or more domains within the CGA were defined as vulnerable (20,21). In addition, ECOG performance status (22) was recorded and diagnosis, initial treatment choice (full dose or reduced-dose chemotherapy) based on a multidisciplinary team decision, intolerance to treatment, death and cause of death were extracted from medical records.…”
Section: Assessment Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Por ser extensa e demorada, o rastreamento com um instrumento de fácil aplicação tem sido proposto para identificar aqueles que necessitariam de avaliação mais completa 2,3,4 . Esse é o objetivo do VES-13: rastrear os idosos vulneráveis, ou seja, aqueles com maior risco de declínio funcional e morte, para que sejam submetidos a uma avaliação mais ampla 1 .…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…É um instrumento simplificado, com tempo médio de aplicação de cinco minutos e constituído por 13 itens, que contemplam idade, saúde autorreferida, capacidade funcional e condição físi-ca 1 . Apresentou boa confiabilidade e validade em estudo com idosos com câncer de prósta-ta 2 , e tem sido utilizado como instrumento de rastreio em pacientes oncológicos 3,4 .…”
Section: O Objetivo Do Estudo Foi Descrever As Etapas Iniciais De Adaunclassified